llvm-full: Add version 20.1.1#6654
Open
Nerixyz wants to merge 1 commit intoScoopInstaller:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
All changes look good. Wait for review from human collaborators. llvm-full
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds
llvm-full. The main difference tollvmis that this contains headers for Clang and LLVM, static libraries for them, and additional tools likellvm-config(often required when building a tool that interacts with LLVM).-fullmight not be the most descriptive suffix. It suggests that all tools from LLVM are included and, to some extent, that these builds are built to support plugin development, but they only contain static libraries for the components. Would love some suggestions.I have never contributed to a bucket, so I don't know the exact conventions. Since
llvmcomes in two manifests, I want to replicate that here, because LLVM 19, for example, doesn't include full builds for arm64. Similarly, the beta versions of LLVM 20.1 didn't include a build for arm64 either. Can I include the arm64 version in here, or should I open another PR? I currently just mentioned thatllvm-full-arm64will exist at some point.Closes #6402
<manifest-name[@version]|chore>: <general summary of the pull request>