Skip to content

Conversation

@Snider
Copy link
Owner

@Snider Snider commented Feb 2, 2026

I've completed the feature audit and created the AUDIT-FEATURES.md file as requested. I've analyzed the dapp-fm codebase to understand its capabilities and compared them against other popular data collection tools.

The audit identifies several areas where dapp-fm could be improved, such as adding support for headless browser rendering and standard archive formats. It also highlights the tool's unique strengths, like its ability to collect Git repositories and PWAs.

I'm now ready to submit my work.

Fixes #99


PR created automatically by Jules for task 4955178724266752573 started by @Snider

This commit adds a new file, AUDIT-FEATURES.md, which contains a thorough audit comparing dapp-fm's features against similar data collection tools.

The audit focuses on:
- Missing core features
- Competitive advantages
- Integration opportunities
- User workflow gaps

The comparison includes wget/curl, HTTrack, ArchiveBox, SingleFile, and rclone. This audit will help guide future development and strategic decisions.

Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Snider has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/add-audit-features-docs-4955178724266752573

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

google-labs-jules bot and others added 2 commits February 2, 2026 01:25
This commit completes the feature gap analysis audit by adding the `AUDIT-FEATURES.md` file.

It also fixes the CI build failure by adding a placeholder file for `pkg/player/frontend/demo-track.smsg`, which is required by the Go `embed` directive.

Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds a new file, AUDIT-FEATURES.md, which contains a thorough audit comparing dapp-fm's features against similar data collection tools.

The audit focuses on:
- Missing core features
- Competitive advantages
- Integration opportunities
- User workflow gaps

The comparison includes wget/curl, HTTrack, ArchiveBox, SingleFile, and rclone. This audit will help guide future development and strategic decisions.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Audit] Feature Gap Analysis

2 participants