Skip to content

Conversation

@Snider
Copy link
Owner

@Snider Snider commented Feb 2, 2026

This submission includes a comprehensive performance audit report, AUDIT-PERFORMANCE.md, which details the performance of the Enchantrix codebase. The report includes an analysis of memory usage, concurrency, and build and deploy performance. Additionally, this submission adds benchmarks for the trix, crypt, and enchantrix packages to establish a performance baseline.

Fixes #50


PR created automatically by Jules for task 8888965575970294432 started by @Snider

This commit introduces a comprehensive performance audit of the Enchantrix codebase, culminating in the creation of the `AUDIT-PERFORMANCE.md` report.

The audit includes:
- An analysis of the `trix` CLI's memory usage and single-threaded nature.
- An evaluation of the project's build and deploy performance.
- The addition of benchmarks for the `trix`, `crypt`, and `enchantrix` packages to establish a performance baseline.

In addition, this commit addresses feedback from the code review by:
- Removing binary artifacts (`.prof`, `.test`) from the commit.
- Updating the `.gitignore` file to prevent these artifacts from being committed in the future.

Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Snider has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/performance-audit-8888965575970294432

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

audit: Performance bottlenecks and optimization

2 participants