Draft
Conversation
3b55613 to
e3866a0
Compare
* Update integration test dependencies
|
Hi @Strech |
Owner
Author
|
Hey @Hanspagh I don't have a priority over my prototype PRs for now, but it may come eventually. This is very rough and unfinished work so far with lots of issues to consider (still). |
|
That is totally fair, let me know if you want any help getting this shipped. |
Owner
Author
|
@Hanspagh I will not promise anything, but I plan to work on it one day. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As a partial resolution to the logical types conversion, we are going to start with just decoding as the easiest to implement because we already control the decoder hooks.
Resolves #109