Skip to content

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 45: Information exposure through a stack trace#52

Draft
Tanker187 wants to merge 58 commits intomainfrom
alert-autofix-45
Draft

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 45: Information exposure through a stack trace#52
Tanker187 wants to merge 58 commits intomainfrom
alert-autofix-45

Conversation

@Tanker187
Copy link
Owner

Potential fix for https://github.com/Tanker187/vite/security/code-scanning/45

In general, the fix is to stop sending the stack trace back to the client and instead send a generic error message while logging the detailed error on the server. The server log can still include e.stack so that developers can debug issues without exposing internal details to users.

For this specific file, the best minimal fix that preserves existing behavior is:

  • Keep logging e.stack to the server console (or otherwise), so debugging remains possible.
  • Change res.status(500).end(e.stack) to return a generic message that does not contain the stack trace or internal details, for example "Internal Server Error" or a similar neutral string.
  • Optionally, you may choose a different message depending on environment (e.g., slightly more descriptive in non‑prod), but it should never include e.stack.

Concretely, in playground/ssr-conditions/server.js within the catch (e) block around line 69:

  • Leave vite && vite.ssrFixStacktrace(e) and console.log(e.stack) as-is.
  • Replace res.status(500).end(e.stack) with a call that sends a fixed message such as res.status(500).end('Internal Server Error').

No additional imports or helper methods are needed; Express already supports this usage.


Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Tanker187 and others added 30 commits December 12, 2025 17:26
This workflow runs tests and publishes a Node.js package to GitHub Packages upon release creation.
This workflow installs Deno, runs linting, and executes tests on push and pull request events to the main branch.
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…m environment values

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ression

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…in path expression

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…in path expression

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ression

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ing or encoding

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ripting

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Tanker187 and others added 28 commits February 11, 2026 01:45
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 6: Missing rate limiting
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 12: Shell command built from environment values
…ression

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 52: Inefficient regular expression
Create npm-publish-github-packages.yml
Create google-cloudrun-source.yml
Create google-cloudrun-docker.yml
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 32: Bad HTML filtering regexp
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 28: Uncontrolled data used in path expression
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 30: Uncontrolled data used in path expression
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 34: Incomplete string escaping or encoding
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 4: Incorrect suffix check
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 51: Inefficient regular expression
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 5: Missing rate limiting
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 16: Reflected cross-site scripting
…rough a stack trace

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant