Verify .zonf extension usage across codebase - no changes required

[Copilot]

Audit requested to replace .zon file extension references with .zonf throughout the codebase.

Analysis Results

Status: Already compliant - comprehensive scan found zero instances of .zon extension in use.

Verified Locations

• Source code (src/zon/): All file I/O operations use .zonf
• Tests (tests/): 340 tests reference .zonf exclusively
• Scripts (scripts/): Generation and utility scripts use .zonf
• Documentation (docs/, README.md): Specifies .zonf as standard extension
• Examples (examples/): All example files use .zonf

Current Usage

# scripts/examples/generate_examples.py:258
zon_path = os.path.join(EXAMPLES_DIR, f"{ex['name']}.zonf")

# scripts/utils/export_datasets.py:41
zon_path = OUTPUT_DIR / f"{name}.zonf"

# tests/cli/test_cli.py:114
input_file = os.path.join(TEMP_DIR, 'valid.zonf')

Note: .zonb binary format extension is intentionally separate and correct.

The codebase has already been migrated to use .zonf consistently. No code changes needed.

Original prompt

there are lots of places where zon has been used within the code and not zonf as extention to the detect this format file.

I need you to go function by function within each folder tree within the codebase and make sure its changed and also make sure all test are also configured with same .zonf extention and not .zon

---

💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}