-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
fix: fix flaky test testNonBlockingWithMultipleMessages #576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix: fix flaky test testNonBlockingWithMultipleMessages #576
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @cmtoan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses and resolves a flaky test, Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses a flaky test, testNonBlockingWithMultipleMessages, by ensuring proper cleanup of test resources. The change introduces a try-finally block to delete the task created during the test, which is a solid approach to prevent state leakage between test runs. I've added a suggestion to further improve test isolation by using a dynamically generated unique ID for the task, which would make the test more robust, especially in environments with parallel test execution.
| // 1. Send first non-blocking message to create task in WORKING state | ||
| Message message1 = Message.builder(MESSAGE) | ||
| .taskId("multi-event-test") | ||
| String multiEventTaskId = "multi-event-test"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using a try-finally block to ensure task cleanup is a great improvement for test stability. To make this test even more robust and prevent any potential conflicts from hardcoded IDs (e.g., if tests were to run in parallel in the future), consider using a unique ID for each test run. Appending a random UUID is a common pattern for this.
| String multiEventTaskId = "multi-event-test"; | |
| String multiEventTaskId = "multi-event-test-" + java.util.UUID.randomUUID(); |
Description
fix flaky test testNonBlockingWithMultipleMessages
Fixes #557 🦕