Skip to content

docs: qualify sealed-channel status in README#39

Merged
imran-siddique merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/qualify-sealed-channel-status
Jul 4, 2026
Merged

docs: qualify sealed-channel status in README#39
imran-siddique merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/qualify-sealed-channel-status

Conversation

@imran-siddique

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The profile section and the how-it-works flow describe the sealed peer channel as if payloads are already sealed to a verified attested measurement (README.md "decrypts only inside the verified enclave"). LIMITATIONS.md is more careful: the channel encryption is implemented, but binding the seal to a verified hardware measurement on a live inbound call is not yet wired ("do not assume a payload is confined to a specific attested measurement").

This adds the in-progress qualifier at the point of claim and a short status note on the how-it-works flow, so the README matches LIMITATIONS.md and ROADMAP.md. The detailed accounts in LIMITATIONS.md/ROADMAP.md are already accurate and are unchanged; this only aligns the README's forward-looking statements. Docs-only.

Closes #38

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The sealed peer channel is described in the profile and how-it-works
sections as if payloads are already sealed to a verified attested
measurement, but LIMITATIONS.md states the enclave-measurement binding
is not yet wired on a live call ("do not assume a payload is confined
to a specific attested measurement"). Add the in-progress qualifier at
the point of claim and a status note on the how-it-works flow, so the
README matches LIMITATIONS.md and ROADMAP.md. Docs-only. (#38)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@imran-siddique imran-siddique merged commit 003083f into main Jul 4, 2026
12 checks passed
@imran-siddique imran-siddique deleted the docs/qualify-sealed-channel-status branch July 4, 2026 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs: sealed-channel measurement-binding stated as fact in README but LIMITATIONS says not to assume it yet

1 participant