-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Update the monitoring architecture description #346
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe documentation file describing the monitoring system architecture was restructured to shift its primary focus from an overall monitoring breakdown to alert rule CRUD operations and end-to-end alert processing workflows, introducing new architectural components and removing previous collection, storage, and query flow descriptions. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor User
participant UI as Front-end (Courier API)
participant ALB as ALB<br/>(Router)
participant API as Alert Rule API
participant Prometheus as Prometheus/VM<br/>(Storage)
participant Warlock as Warlock<br/>(Executor)
participant Nevermore as Nevermore<br/>(Notifier)
rect rgb(200, 220, 255)
Note over User,API: Alert Rule CRUD
User->>UI: Create/Update/Delete Alert Rule
UI->>ALB: HTTP Request
ALB->>API: Route to API Service
API->>Prometheus: Store Rule Configuration
end
rect rgb(220, 200, 255)
Note over Prometheus,Nevermore: Real-time Alert Processing
Warlock->>Prometheus: Query Metrics (based on rules)
Warlock->>Warlock: Evaluate Conditions
Warlock->>Nevermore: Trigger Alert
Nevermore->>User: Send Notification
end
rect rgb(200, 255, 220)
Note over UI,Prometheus: Display Real-time Alerts
UI->>ALB: Poll/WebSocket for Alert Status
ALB->>API: Fetch Alert State
API->>Prometheus: Get Current Alerts
API-->>UI: Return Alert Data
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
docs/en/observability/monitor/architecture/architecture.mdx (5)
10-15: Clarify terminology and introduce unfamiliar components.The "erebus" component is referenced without explanation of its role or nature. Additionally, terminology like "prometheus/vm operator" uses inconsistent formatting. Consider introducing key components (erebus, Nevermore, Warlock) with brief context before their first mention, or consolidate nomenclature.
17-21: Improve clarity of configuration loading and break up long sentences.Line 19 uses vague language ("monitoring collection and alert rule configurations"). Be more specific about what configurations are synchronized (e.g., scrape configs, rule definitions). Line 21 is a long compound sentence that would benefit from being split into multiple sentences for readability.
23-26: Clarify ambiguous phrasing and document technical details.Line 25 uses unclear phrasing: "retrieves the monitoring address based on the feature monitoring"—this should be more specific about how the monitoring address is determined (e.g., based on cluster metadata, feature flags, configuration). Also clarify the purpose and scope of the request address
/platform/monitoring.alauda.io/v1beta1. The mention of port 11780 should include context about why this specific port is used or be documented in a glossary.
28-34: Standardize terminology and clarify operator roles.This section uses inconsistent naming conventions: "Prometheus-Operator" vs. "prometheus/vm operator" vs. "VictoriaMetrics-Operator". Standardize these terms throughout the documentation. Also clarify what "alert interval configuration" means in line 31 (evaluation interval, notification interval, repeat interval?). Line 32 vaguely refers to "content of the alert policies"—specify which fields/properties are synchronized. Consider breaking this dense section into substeps for clarity.
36-44: Remove redundant phrasing and clarify "primarily" qualifications.Line 38 contains redundant phrasing: "metrics from courier-api are collected by the Global Prometheus (collected every 15 seconds)"—the word "collected" is repeated. Lines 40 and 42 both use "primarily obtained," which suggests alternate paths that are never explained. Either remove the qualifier or document the alternate mechanisms. The 15-second collection interval in line 38 should be validated and possibly documented in an operational section if it's a configurable or important SLA.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/en/observability/monitor/assets/visio_for_monitor.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/en/observability/monitor/architecture/architecture.mdx(1 hunks)
Deploying alauda-container-platform with
|
| Latest commit: |
dfdda11
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://8d8e1a73.alauda-container-platform.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feat-ait-63059.alauda-container-platform.pages.dev |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.