-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 471
Use Timer object to improve timekeeping code #4380
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+48
−51
Merged
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
df30eef
Use NanoTime in more places
DomGarguilo 865e11b
Rename vars to remove timeunit
DomGarguilo 6a9a2e7
Update server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/table…
DomGarguilo d917013
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into useNanoTimeMore
DomGarguilo 148b2b0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into useNanoTimeMore
DomGarguilo 4d599ba
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/3.1' into useNanoTimeMore
DomGarguilo a42fec1
Replace old NanoTime object with Timer
DomGarguilo 213a466
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/3.1' into useNanoTimeMore
DomGarguilo 18233c1
Fix logic in tryLock()
DomGarguilo 649fdcd
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into useNanoTimeMore
DomGarguilo 337ff21
add back code lost in merge
DomGarguilo 3c8b4f4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into useNanoTimeMore
DomGarguilo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you know if there's a possibility of using reset for this, instead of replacing the timer? It seems odd to replace the timer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Timer lastMemoryCheckTimeis initialized as null and then the code checks if its null in places to see if the check has happened yet. We could probably achieve the same with one Timer and a boolean flag that indicates if the check has happened yet but this seemed like this best way to do things from what I can tell.