Skip to content

Conversation

@guan404ming
Copy link
Member

Why

Enable exception-free C++ API similar to Rust's Result or C++23's std::expected, as requested in #234.

How

  • Add Expected<T> class holding either success value T or Error
  • Add Function::CallExpected<T>() for exception-free function calls
  • Add is_expected type trait and Expected handling in unpack_call
  • Support registering functions that return Expected<T>"

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @guan404ming, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly improves the error handling capabilities within the FFI layer by introducing a new Expected type. This type provides a robust, exception-free mechanism for FFI functions to communicate either a successful result or a detailed error, aligning with modern C++ practices and similar patterns in other languages. The changes ensure that FFI calls can explicitly manage potential failures without relying on exceptions for control flow, leading to more predictable and maintainable code.

Highlights

  • Introduced ffi::Expected: A new type for exception-free error handling, similar to Rust's Result or C++23's std::expected, allowing functions to return either a success value T or an Error.
  • Added Function::CallExpected(): A new method for FFI function calls that returns an Expected, converting any caught exceptions into Error objects within the Expected type.
  • Enhanced FFI Type System: Integrated Expected into the FFI type traits (is_expected and RetSupported) and the unpack_call mechanism, enabling seamless handling of functions returning Expected.
  • Support for Registering Expected-Returning Functions: Functions that return Expected can now be registered with the FFI system, allowing them to be called from other languages or contexts while preserving the explicit error handling.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@guan404ming guan404ming changed the title feat: Add ffi::Expected<T> for exception-free error handling feat: add ffi::Expected<T> for exception-free error handling Jan 11, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces ffi::Expected<T> for exception-free error handling, a valuable addition for creating more robust FFI functions. The implementation is comprehensive, covering the Expected<T> class, integration with tvm::ffi::Function via CallExpected, and support for packed functions returning Expected<T>. The tests are thorough and cover many important use cases.

The overall approach of using tvm::ffi::Any for storage within Expected<T> is a clever way to leverage the existing FFI infrastructure. I have a few suggestions to simplify the TypeTraits specialization and to add move semantics for value/error accessors, which would improve code clarity and performance. Overall, this is a well-executed feature.

Comment on lines +103 to +108
TVM_FFI_INLINE T value() const {
if (is_err()) {
TVM_FFI_THROW(RuntimeError) << "Bad expected access: contains error";
}
return data_.cast<T>();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The value() method is const-qualified, which means it always returns a copy of the contained value. This can be inefficient when the Expected object is an rvalue (e.g., a temporary returned from a function). Consider adding an rvalue-qualified overload to allow moving the value out. This would improve performance in scenarios like std::move(expected).value().

You can change the existing method to be const&-qualified and add a &&-qualified overload:

TVM_FFI_INLINE T value() const& {
  if (is_err()) {
    TVM_FFI_THROW(RuntimeError) << "Bad expected access: contains error";
  }
  return data_.cast<T>();
}

TVM_FFI_INLINE T value() && {
  if (is_err()) {
    TVM_FFI_THROW(RuntimeError) << "Bad expected access: contains error";
  }
  return std::move(data_).cast<T>();
}

Comment on lines +116 to +119
TVM_FFI_INLINE Error error() const {
TVM_FFI_ICHECK(is_err()) << "Expected does not contain an error";
return data_.cast<Error>();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Similar to value(), the error() method is const-qualified and always returns a copy. You can add an rvalue-qualified overload to allow moving the Error object out, which is more efficient.

TVM_FFI_INLINE Error error() const& {
  TVM_FFI_ICHECK(is_err()) << "Expected does not contain an error";
  return data_.cast<Error>();
}

TVM_FFI_INLINE Error error() && {
  TVM_FFI_ICHECK(is_err()) << "Expected does not contain an error";
  return std::move(data_).cast<Error>();
}

Comment on lines +178 to +191
TVM_FFI_INLINE static void CopyToAnyView(const Expected<T>& src, TVMFFIAny* result) {
// Extract value from src.data_ and copy it properly
const TVMFFIAny* src_any = reinterpret_cast<const TVMFFIAny*>(&src.data_);

if (TypeTraits<T>::CheckAnyStrict(src_any)) {
// It contains T, copy it out and move to result
T value = TypeTraits<T>::CopyFromAnyViewAfterCheck(src_any);
TypeTraits<T>::MoveToAny(std::move(value), result);
} else {
// It contains Error, copy it out and move to result
Error err = TypeTraits<Error>::CopyFromAnyViewAfterCheck(src_any);
TypeTraits<Error>::MoveToAny(std::move(err), result);
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The implementation of CopyToAnyView is correct but can be simplified. Instead of checking the type and manually performing a copy-then-move for each case, you can leverage the Any type's copy constructor to handle the logic. This makes the code more concise and less error-prone, as it relies on the already-tested Any copy semantics.

  TVM_FFI_INLINE static void CopyToAnyView(const Expected<T>& src, TVMFFIAny* result) {
    // An Expected<T> is represented by its underlying value (T or Error)
    // at the FFI boundary. We can simply copy the contained Any.
    Any copied_any = src.data_;
    *result = details::AnyUnsafe::MoveAnyToTVMFFIAny(std::move(copied_any));
  }

Comment on lines +193 to +206
TVM_FFI_INLINE static void MoveToAny(Expected<T> src, TVMFFIAny* result) {
// Extract value from src.data_ and move it properly
TVMFFIAny* src_any = reinterpret_cast<TVMFFIAny*>(&src.data_);

if (TypeTraits<T>::CheckAnyStrict(src_any)) {
// It contains T, move it out and move to result
T value = TypeTraits<T>::MoveFromAnyAfterCheck(src_any);
TypeTraits<T>::MoveToAny(std::move(value), result);
} else {
// It contains Error, move it out and move to result
Error err = TypeTraits<Error>::MoveFromAnyAfterCheck(src_any);
TypeTraits<Error>::MoveToAny(std::move(err), result);
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Similar to CopyToAnyView, the MoveToAny implementation can be greatly simplified. Since src is passed by value (effectively a move), you can move the underlying Any object directly. This is more readable and directly expresses the intent of moving the contained value.

  TVM_FFI_INLINE static void MoveToAny(Expected<T> src, TVMFFIAny* result) {
    // An Expected<T> is represented by its underlying value (T or Error)
    // at the FFI boundary. We can simply move the contained Any.
    *result = details::AnyUnsafe::MoveAnyToTVMFFIAny(std::move(src.data_));
  }

@guan404ming guan404ming marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2026 02:56
@tqchen
Copy link
Member

tqchen commented Jan 12, 2026

Thanks a lot for the contribution, this would benefit from careful reviews, @junrushao @DarkSharpness @Ubospica can you help

@Kathryn-cat
Copy link
Contributor

@guan404ming Thanks for the contribution! I will take a closer look sometime this week to provide a round of review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants