docs: state what source text may be committed - #3
Merged
Conversation
Finding rules means reading a lot of other people's writing. Nothing said what of that text was allowed into the repo, which matters because the repo is MIT-licensed and redistributable by anyone. The catalog already held the right line by instinct: all 28 examples_bad across the 24 rules are written rather than lifted, and the examples_ok that quote real prose are Moby-Dick and Federalist No. 44, both public domain and both cited. This writes that down as an invariant so a later contributor doesn't paste in the perfect real-world specimen. Also rules scraped corpora out of scope, and notes that a human reference corpus must be public domain -- one built from copyrighted modern prose can't be redistributed, which strands the precision check that depends on it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018kEipqH8uKLPGz8bZbu4kP
The bullet compared two kinds of exposure before getting to the rule, which buried it. State the rule, the reason, and the consequence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018kEipqH8uKLPGz8bZbu4kP
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Finding rules means reading a lot of other people's writing. Nothing said
what of that text was allowed into the repo, which matters because the repo
is MIT-licensed and redistributable by anyone.
The catalog already held the right line by instinct: all 28 examples_bad
across the 24 rules are written rather than lifted, and the examples_ok that
quote real prose are Moby-Dick and Federalist No. 44, both public domain and
both cited. This writes that down as an invariant so a later contributor
doesn't paste in the perfect real-world specimen.
Also rules scraped corpora out of scope, and notes that a human reference
corpus must be public domain -- one built from copyrighted modern prose
can't be redistributed, which strands the precision check that depends on it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 noreply@anthropic.com
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018kEipqH8uKLPGz8bZbu4kP