Skip to content

Conversation

@box-catzhang
Copy link
Collaborator

@box-catzhang box-catzhang commented Jul 2, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the "@box/metadata-editor" dependency to a newer version for improved compatibility and features.

@box-catzhang box-catzhang requested a review from a team as a code owner July 2, 2025 17:49
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

The version of the "@box/metadata-editor" package was updated from "^0.115.0" to "^0.117.0" in the devDependencies, peerDependencies, and dependencies sections of the package.json file. No other changes were made.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
package.json Updated "@box/metadata-editor" version in dev, peer, and dependencies

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge

Suggested reviewers

  • cghil

Poem

A hop and a skip, a version anew,
Metadata-editor hops to one-one-seven-two!
Dependencies aligned, the carrots in a row,
Rabbits rejoice as the numbers grow.
With every fresh update, our garden stays bright—
Onward we nibble, code shining with light!
🥕✨
"""


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6645a9 and 2c1ac86.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: lint_test_build
  • GitHub Check: Summary

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

300-307: Caret on a 0.x version locks you to patch releases – confirm that’s what you want

^0.117.0 satisfies >=0.117.0 <0.118.0, i.e. patch bumps only.
If consumers should automatically pick up the next minor (e.g. 0.118.x), switch to ~0.117 or >=0.117.0. Otherwise, no action needed.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 463839e and e6645a9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
package.json (1)
Learnt from: rafalmaksymiuk
PR: box/box-ui-elements#4160
File: src/elements/content-sidebar/SidebarToggle.js:21-27
Timestamp: 2025-06-25T13:09:54.538Z
Learning: The box-ui-elements project uses Flow for type annotations in JavaScript files, as indicated by @flow directives in file headers. Type annotations like `: Props` are valid Flow syntax, not TypeScript syntax.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: lint_test_build
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

130-140: Remember to commit the updated yarn.lock

The version bump in devDependencies is fine, but CI will fail if yarn.lock (or package-lock.json) is not regenerated to capture @box/metadata-editor@0.117.0.
Run yarn install --mode=update-lockfile (or equivalent) and commit the lock-file to keep the merge queue green.

@marcoartaviaq marcoartaviaq self-requested a review July 2, 2025 18:01
Copy link
Collaborator

@marcoartaviaq marcoartaviaq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@marcoartaviaq marcoartaviaq self-requested a review July 2, 2025 19:11
@tjuanitas
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify queue

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 2, 2025

queue

🟠 Waiting for conditions to match

Details
  • -closed [📌 queue requirement]
  • any of: [🔀 queue conditions]
    • all of: [📌 queue conditions of queue Automatic boxmoji merge]
      • author = boxmoji
      • files ~= ^i18n/
      • title ~= ^(fix)\(i18n\)?:\supdate translations$
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-neutral = Validate
        • check-skipped = Validate
        • check-success = Validate
      • #approved-reviews-by >= 1 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • #review-threads-unresolved = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • branch-protection-review-decision = APPROVED [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • label != do-not-merge
      • status-success = license/cla
      • status-success = lint_pull_request
      • status-success = lint_test_build
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-success = Summary
        • check-neutral = Summary
        • check-skipped = Summary
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-success = lint_test_build
        • check-neutral = lint_test_build
        • check-skipped = lint_test_build
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-success = license/cla
        • check-neutral = license/cla
        • check-skipped = license/cla
    • all of: [📌 queue conditions of queue Automatic strict merge]
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-neutral = Validate
        • check-skipped = Validate
        • check-success = Validate
      • #approved-reviews-by >= 1 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • #approved-reviews-by >= 2
      • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0
      • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • #review-threads-unresolved = 0
      • #review-threads-unresolved = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • branch-protection-review-decision = APPROVED
      • branch-protection-review-decision = APPROVED [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • label != do-not-merge
      • label = ready-to-merge
      • status-success = license/cla
      • status-success = lint_pull_request
      • status-success = lint_test_build
      • title ~= ^(build|ci|chore|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|revert|style|test)(\([^)]+\))?:\s.+$
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-success = Summary
        • check-neutral = Summary
        • check-skipped = Summary
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-success = lint_test_build
        • check-neutral = lint_test_build
        • check-skipped = lint_test_build
      • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
        • check-success = license/cla
        • check-neutral = license/cla
        • check-skipped = license/cla
  • -conflict [📌 queue requirement]
  • -draft [📌 queue requirement]
  • any of: [📌 queue -> configuration change requirements]
    • -mergify-configuration-changed
    • check-success = Configuration changed

@tjuanitas tjuanitas merged commit 51dd7ca into box:master Jul 2, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants