Skip to content

Conversation

@greg-in-a-box
Copy link
Contributor

@greg-in-a-box greg-in-a-box commented Jul 15, 2025

resolve #4182

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated several package dependencies to newer versions.
    • Added a new package dependency to improve compatibility and functionality.
    • Enhanced testing setup to better handle the new package during test transformations.

@greg-in-a-box greg-in-a-box requested a review from a team as a code owner July 15, 2025 15:44
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

This change updates the versions of several @box scoped dependencies in package.json, including @box/blueprint-web, @box/blueprint-web-assets, and @box/item-icon. It also adds @box/types as a new dependency and modifies the version constraint for @box/cldr-data in peerDependencies. Additionally, the Jest configuration was updated to transform @box/types modules.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
package.json Upgraded versions for @box/blueprint-web, @box/blueprint-web-assets, @box/item-icon; added @box/types to dev and peer dependencies; updated @box/cldr-data version constraint in peer dependencies.
scripts/jest/jest.config.js Added @box/types to transformIgnorePatterns to enable Jest to transform this package.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix resolution error for @box/types (#4182)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes detected.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge

Suggested reviewers

  • tjuanitas
  • jpan-box

Poem

A hop, a skip, a version bump—
Dependencies leap, no need to jump!
New types arrive, the icons shine,
Blueprint assets all align.
The garden grows with every change,
A rabbit’s joy, in version range! 🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

tjiang-box
tjiang-box previously approved these changes Jul 15, 2025
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2025
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 15, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: checks failed.

The merge conditions cannot be satisfied due to failing checks:

You can check the last failing draft PR here: #4187.

You may have to fix your CI before adding the pull request to the queue again.
If you update this pull request, to fix the CI, it will automatically be requeued once the queue conditions match again.
If you think this was a flaky issue instead, you can requeue the pull request, without updating it, by posting a @mergifyio requeue comment.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 15, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: checks failed.

The merge conditions cannot be satisfied due to failing checks.

You may have to fix your CI before adding the pull request to the queue again.
If you update this pull request, to fix the CI, it will automatically be requeued once the queue conditions match again.
If you think this was a flaky issue instead, you can requeue the pull request, without updating it, by posting a @mergifyio requeue comment.

@greg-in-a-box greg-in-a-box deleted the bumps branch July 30, 2025 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can't resolve '@box/types'

3 participants