Skip to content

Comments

Syncing from upstream OCA/operating-unit (19.0)#746

Merged
bt-admin merged 3 commits intobrain-tec:19.0from
OCA:19.0
Jan 15, 2026
Merged

Syncing from upstream OCA/operating-unit (19.0)#746
bt-admin merged 3 commits intobrain-tec:19.0from
OCA:19.0

Conversation

@bt-admin
Copy link

bt_gitbot

vvrossem and others added 3 commits January 14, 2026 13:48
`account.move` should default on the journal's operating unit (if set)
instead of the user's operating unit
Signed-off-by AaronHForgeFlow
@bt-admin bt-admin added the 19.0 label Jan 15, 2026
@bt-admin bt-admin merged commit 2ddb9ab into brain-tec:19.0 Jan 15, 2026
4 checks passed
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.59%. Comparing base (b247691) to head (7110b04).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on 19.0.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
account_operating_unit/models/account_move.py 0.00% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             19.0     #746      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.07%   93.59%   -0.49%     
==========================================
  Files          44       44              
  Lines         777      781       +4     
  Branches       79       81       +2     
==========================================
  Hits          731      731              
- Misses         22       25       +3     
- Partials       24       25       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants