π‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix command injection in Process invocations#59
π‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix command injection in Process invocations#59
Conversation
Replaced insecure `/bin/bash -c` wrappers and string-interpolated shell executions with direct `Process` execution using `/usr/bin/env` and explicitly defined arguments arrays. This resolves a significant command injection vulnerability risk across `CacheoutViewModel` and `CacheCategory` and implements proper defense in depth. Co-authored-by: acebytes <2820910+acebytes@users.noreply.github.com>
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
π¨ Severity: HIGH
π‘ Vulnerability: Command Injection risk via string-interpolated shell commands (
shell("/usr/bin/which \(tool)")) and unnecessary bash wrappers (/bin/bash -c "docker system prune...").π― Impact: Attackers or compromised environment variables could potentially inject arbitrary shell commands.
π§ Fix: Replaced
shellwrappers with directProcessinvocation using/usr/bin/envandargumentsarrays to bypass the shell completely. Properly maintained output redirection by assigning standard pipes.β Verification: Tested manually by verifying
Processstruct setups avoid-cexecution paths. Run./scripts/test.shto confirm no regressions.PR created automatically by Jules for task 1709610734122831749 started by @acebytes