Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [CRITICAL] Fix command injection in toolExists#64

Open
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel-fix-command-injection-toolexists-3052558096566051674
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [CRITICAL] Fix command injection in toolExists#64
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel-fix-command-injection-toolexists-3052558096566051674

Conversation

@acebytes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Severity: CRITICAL
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: Command injection risk existed in CacheCategory.swift within toolExists where shell("/usr/bin/which \(tool)") directly interpolated the dynamic tool string into a /bin/bash -c executed command string.
🎯 Impact: If the tool variable were ever derived dynamically or allowed any user-controlled inputs, it could have resulted in arbitrary command execution on the host machine.
πŸ”§ Fix: Replaced the shell wrapper execution with direct Foundation.Process invocation using /usr/bin/env and passing the tool exclusively through process.arguments = ["which", tool].
βœ… Verification: Tested manually that the fix correctly returns whether the tool exists via standard termination status without introducing command injection paths.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 3052558096566051674 started by @acebytes

Co-authored-by: acebytes <2820910+acebytes@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant