-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Release: demo feature #35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Add comprehensive demo directory with: - Sample TypeScript files (basic, advanced, edge-cases) - Documentation examples (valid, invalid, mixed patterns) - NPM scripts for quick testing (demo:validate, demo:fix) - Shell scripts for validation and fixing - Complete README with usage guide This allows users to test docs-coderef locally with various CODE_REF patterns and understand tool capabilities. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Changes: - class-methods.md: Convert class symbol refs to line-based refs (class symbol search not yet supported) - variables.md: Add JSDoc comments to match tool extraction - line-based.md: Update line numbers for Prettier-formatted code Now `npm run demo:validate:valid` passes all validations ✅ 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add npm script to reset demo documentation to original state: - Restores demo/docs/ from git - Removes any backup files created by fix command Usage: npm run demo:reset This is more convenient than running the shell script directly. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Update user-facing documentation to include the new demo environment: - README.md: Add Demo Environment section with quick start - CLAUDE.md: Add demo commands to Quick Reference - docs/development/getting-started.md: Add Demo Environment section This helps users discover and use the demo environment for testing docs-coderef functionality locally. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Feature/#33 build demo environment
Pull Request Review: Demo Environment FeatureOverviewThis PR adds a comprehensive demo environment for testing Summary: ✅ Approved with minor suggestions ✅ Strengths1. Excellent Documentation
2. Comprehensive Test CoverageThe demo environment covers multiple scenarios:
3. Good Developer Experience
4. Proper Configuration
5. Follows Project Conventions
🔍 Areas for Improvement1. Shell Script Portability (Minor)Location: if ls demo/docs/**/*.backup 1> /dev/null 2>&1; thenIssue: The Suggestion: Use if find demo/docs -name "*.backup" -type f 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
echo "Removing backup files..."
find demo/docs -name "*.backup" -type f -delete
echo "✓ Backup files removed"
fiAlternatively, update the shebang to explicitly enable globstar: #\!/bin/bash
shopt -s globstar2. Shell Script Error Handling (Minor)Location: All shell scripts Suggestion: Add #\!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail # Exit on error, undefined variables, and pipe failuresThis prevents silent failures and makes debugging easier. 3. NPM Script Consistency (Minor)Location: The "demo:reset": "git checkout demo/docs/ && rm -f demo/docs/**/*.backup 2>/dev/null || true"Issue: Same globstar concern as above. Suggestion: Either call the shell script or use "demo:reset": "./demo/scripts/reset-demo.sh"This delegates to the shell script which can handle the logic more robustly. 4. Demo Source Files - Missing Files (Question)Location: The README mentions these files: Question: I see these files are listed in the file tree, but I didn't verify their contents. Could you confirm these files exist and contain appropriate examples? If they're not being referenced by any demo documentation, they should either be documented or removed to avoid confusion. 5. Test Coverage (Enhancement)Suggestion: Consider adding automated tests for the demo environment:
Example test structure: describe('Demo Environment', () => {
it('should pass validation for all valid examples', () => {
// Run validation on demo/docs/valid
// Assert exit code 0
});
it('should detect errors in invalid examples', () => {
// Run validation on demo/docs/invalid
// Assert specific error types are present
});
});6. Security - Script Execution Permissions (Best Practice)Suggestion: Ensure shell scripts have executable permissions committed to git: git add --chmod=+x demo/scripts/*.shWhile users can always 🔒 Security Review✅ No security concerns identified
🎨 Code QualityStyle Adherence✅ Follows project coding standards:
Documentation Quality✅ Excellent documentation:
Commit Quality✅ Good commit practices:
🐛 Potential BugsNone IdentifiedThe code appears solid. The invalid examples are intentionally invalid (as designed), which is correct. ⚡ Performance ConcernsNone Identified
📊 Test CoverageCurrent State: No automated tests for demo environment Recommendation: Add integration tests to verify:
This prevents the demo from becoming outdated when the tool changes. 📝 Documentation Updates✅ Well Done:
Minor Suggestion: Consider adding a "What to try first" or "Recommended learning path" section to help new users navigate the demo more effectively. 🎯 SummaryThis is a high-quality PR that adds significant value to the project: Strengths:
Recommendations:
Verdict:Approved ✅ - The suggestions above are minor improvements and don't block merging. This PR provides excellent value and can be merged as-is, with the suggested improvements addressed in follow-up work if desired. Great work on this feature! The demo environment will significantly help users understand and test Review completed: 2026-01-01 |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 0.3.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
No description provided.