Add exploratory research notebook for evaluating upstream URLs in Fedora RPM metadata#213
Draft
MoralCode wants to merge 6 commits into
Draft
Add exploratory research notebook for evaluating upstream URLs in Fedora RPM metadata#213MoralCode wants to merge 6 commits into
MoralCode wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Adrian Edwards <adredwar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Edwards <adredwar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Edwards <adredwar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Edwards <adredwar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Edwards <adredwar@redhat.com>
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a notebook ive been working on as part of https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/how-can-we-include-upstream-urls-in-fedora-packages/193180/
Its essentially a first pass analysis to compare the quality of the data in both the
URLandVCSfields of fedora RPM packages to help decide the best path forward for the discussionMarked as draft since theres a chance i may still add to it, but it should be usable and ready
Since i was unsure how to provide the packages this depends on in a standard python dependency manager way, i removed them and documented what packages this needs to run so that the person running the notebooks can use their own preferred setup to make sure the dependencies are available in the jupyter kernel