Skip to content

Conversation

@KetteyMan
Copy link

@KetteyMan KetteyMan commented Jan 4, 2026

Update Reputation Documentation

Summary

Refactored the Reputation system documentation to include a detailed calculation framework with transparent scoring formulas, replacing the previous conceptual description.

Key Changes

1. Document Structure

  • Updated description to emphasize transparency and ecosystem privileges
  • Restructured "What is reputation" section with new "Why build reputation" subsection
  • Clarified reputation as a quantitative score (0-100)

2. New Calculation Framework Section

Added comprehensive scoring details:

  • Total Score Formula: Reputation = 0.15 × R_Identity + 0.1 × R_Login + 0.2 × R_Staking + 0.55 × R_Contribution - R_Malicious_Behavior
  • Five Dimensions Explained:
    • Identity (15%): Verifies "Humanity" & Reachability
    • Login Activity (10%): Rewards Consistency & Habit
    • Staking (20%): Staking as Confidence
    • Contribution Quality (55%): Bayesian Smooth Average
    • Penalties: Three-Strike Rule

3. Updated Lifecycle Flowchart

  • New flowchart showing complete flow from input events to final score
  • Clarified real-time vs periodic updates
  • Emphasized 180-day rolling window decay mechanism

4. Simplified Privacy Section

  • Streamlined content while maintaining transparency principle
  • Clear boundaries between public and private data

Multi-language Sync

  • English (en/core-systems/reputation.mdx): Complete update
  • Chinese (cn/core-systems/reputation.mdx): Full translation
  • Korean (ko/core-systems/reputation.mdx): Full translation

All language versions maintain consistent formatting and structure.

Files Changed

  • en/core-systems/reputation.mdx
  • cn/core-systems/reputation.mdx
  • ko/core-systems/reputation.mdx

Copy link
Collaborator

@beingzy beingzy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approve first to unblock iterations.
Please, consider comments and do updating accordingly.


### 为什么构建声誉

声誉不仅仅是一个虚荣指标;它是驱动价值分配和安全性的引擎。
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

虚荣 -> 荣誉

声誉不仅仅是一个虚荣指标;它是驱动价值分配和安全性的引擎。

- **对于用户(激励与特权):**
- **直接奖励影响:** 声誉严重影响重大经济事件,例如在**代币生成事件(TGE)**期间的加权,或确定**积分到代币转换**的汇率。
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

直接奖励影响: 声誉在协议层面决定收益差异——即便是同等贡献,不同声誉对应不同回报;同时,它深度参与大规模激励机制(如持续性 Airdrop),积分到代币转换 汇率,以及对特殊任务与专属权益的优先获取权。

备注:TGE已经发生,我们可以不讨论了。


- **加权贡献。** 在**数据组装**中,来自高声誉身份的原子贡献获得**更多权重**。这允许降低审查法定人数,并为受信任用户提供更高的纳入优先级。
- **治理所有权。** 根据**版税引擎**的定义,更高声誉的贡献者可能为同等贡献类型获得**更大份额的所有权分数**。
- **访问控制。** 某些高价值任务或敏感数据验证角色由**声誉层级**控制。
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

访问控制:

除了分数本身,声誉在 Codatta 架构中作为功能层:

- **加权贡献。** 在**数据组装**中,来自高声誉身份的原子贡献获得**更多权重**。这允许降低审查法定人数,并为受信任用户提供更高的纳入优先级。
- **治理所有权。** 根据**版税引擎**的定义,更高声誉的贡献者可能为同等贡献类型获得**更大份额的所有权分数**。
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

治理所有权:


除了分数本身,声誉在 Codatta 架构中作为功能层:

- **加权贡献。** 在**数据组装**中,来自高声誉身份的原子贡献获得**更多权重**。这允许降低审查法定人数,并为受信任用户提供更高的纳入优先级。
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

加权贡献:

@beingzy beingzy merged commit 682d6a3 into main Jan 5, 2026
2 checks passed
@beingzy beingzy deleted the update_reputation_doc branch January 5, 2026 02:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants