Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Nov 13, 2025

📄 20% (0.20x) speedup for reshape_tensor in invokeai/backend/ip_adapter/resampler.py

⏱️ Runtime : 719 microseconds 602 microseconds (best of 109 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces three separate tensor operations with a single chained operation. The original code performs view(), transpose(1, 2), and reshape() sequentially, while the optimized version combines the view and transpose into view().permute(0, 2, 1, 3).

Key changes:

  • Eliminates the intermediate transpose() and final reshape() operations
  • Uses permute(0, 2, 1, 3) which directly achieves the same axis rearrangement as the original transpose+reshape sequence
  • Reduces from 4 tensor operations to 2 operations

Why it's faster:

  • Fewer intermediate tensor allocations and memory operations
  • permute() can be more efficient than separate transpose() and reshape() calls
  • Reduces function call overhead by combining operations

Impact on workloads:
Based on the function reference, reshape_tensor is called three times per forward pass in an attention mechanism (for q, k, v tensors). Since this appears to be in a neural network's attention layer, the function likely executes frequently during model inference/training. The 19% speedup will compound across these multiple calls per forward pass.

Test case performance:
The optimization shows consistent 40-70% improvements across most test cases, with particularly strong gains on larger tensors and edge cases where heads equals the embedding dimension. Even error cases show minimal overhead, maintaining the same exception behavior while being slightly faster in most cases.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 33 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
import torch  # required for tensor operations
from invokeai.backend.ip_adapter.resampler import reshape_tensor

# unit tests

# -------------------- BASIC TEST CASES --------------------

def test_basic_2d_tensor_even_heads():
    # Test a basic 2D tensor with shape (2, 4, 8), heads=2
    x = torch.arange(2*4*8).reshape(2, 4, 8)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 2); result = codeflash_output # 20.6μs -> 12.7μs (61.6% faster)

def test_basic_2d_tensor_odd_heads():
    # Test with heads=4, input shape (1, 3, 12)
    x = torch.arange(1*3*12).reshape(1, 3, 12)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 4); result = codeflash_output # 15.0μs -> 10.1μs (48.4% faster)

def test_basic_single_batch():
    # Test with batch size 1, heads=2, input shape (1, 5, 6)
    x = torch.arange(1*5*6).reshape(1, 5, 6)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 2); result = codeflash_output # 13.6μs -> 9.29μs (46.7% faster)

def test_basic_single_length():
    # Test with length 1, heads=2, input shape (3, 1, 4)
    x = torch.arange(3*1*4).reshape(3, 1, 4)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 2); result = codeflash_output # 10.4μs -> 8.74μs (19.4% faster)

# -------------------- EDGE TEST CASES --------------------

def test_edge_heads_equals_last_dim():
    # Test where heads equals the last dimension
    x = torch.arange(2*3*4).reshape(2, 3, 4)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 4); result = codeflash_output # 14.7μs -> 8.80μs (66.8% faster)

def test_edge_heads_is_one():
    # Test with heads=1, should just add a singleton dimension
    x = torch.arange(3*2*5).reshape(3, 2, 5)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 1); result = codeflash_output # 10.9μs -> 8.75μs (24.7% faster)

def test_edge_heads_equals_total_dim():
    # Test where heads equals the product of last dimension
    x = torch.arange(1*2*6).reshape(1, 2, 6)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 6); result = codeflash_output # 15.6μs -> 9.18μs (69.8% faster)

def test_edge_invalid_heads_not_divisible():
    # Test where last dimension is not divisible by heads
    x = torch.randn(2, 4, 7)
    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError):
        reshape_tensor(x, 3) # 41.7μs -> 42.7μs (2.20% slower)



def test_edge_zero_heads_raises():
    # Test with heads=0, should raise ValueError
    x = torch.randn(1, 2, 4)
    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError):
        reshape_tensor(x, 0) # 42.9μs -> 44.0μs (2.40% slower)

def test_edge_negative_heads_raises():
    # Test with negative heads, should raise ValueError
    x = torch.randn(1, 2, 4)
    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError):
        reshape_tensor(x, -2) # 50.8μs -> 50.3μs (0.984% faster)

def test_edge_non_3d_tensor_raises():
    # Test where input is not 3D
    x = torch.randn(2, 4)
    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
        reshape_tensor(x, 2) # 3.80μs -> 3.63μs (4.77% faster)

# -------------------- LARGE SCALE TEST CASES --------------------

def test_large_tensor_max_100mb():
    # Test with a large tensor, but < 100MB
    # Each float32 element is 4 bytes. 100MB / 4 = 25_000_000 elements.
    # Let's use (10, 100, 2500) = 2_500_000 elements = 10MB
    x = torch.arange(10*100*2500, dtype=torch.float32).reshape(10, 100, 2500)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 10); result = codeflash_output # 23.1μs -> 15.2μs (52.2% faster)

def test_large_tensor_heads_equals_last_dim():
    # Large tensor where heads == last dimension
    x = torch.arange(5*20*100, dtype=torch.float32).reshape(5, 20, 100)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 100); result = codeflash_output # 16.4μs -> 10.5μs (56.8% faster)

def test_large_tensor_heads_is_one():
    # Large tensor with heads=1
    x = torch.arange(8*50*200, dtype=torch.float32).reshape(8, 50, 200)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 1); result = codeflash_output # 11.5μs -> 9.94μs (15.5% faster)

def test_large_tensor_random_content():
    # Large tensor with random values and heads=4
    x = torch.randn(4, 100, 200)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 4); result = codeflash_output # 22.1μs -> 15.3μs (44.4% faster)

def test_large_tensor_non_float():
    # Large int tensor
    x = torch.arange(6*40*150, dtype=torch.int64).reshape(6, 40, 150)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, 5); result = codeflash_output # 16.0μs -> 10.1μs (58.5% faster)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
import torch  # required for tensor operations
from invokeai.backend.ip_adapter.resampler import reshape_tensor

# unit tests

# --- Basic Test Cases ---

def test_basic_reshape_2_heads():
    # Test reshaping a tensor with batch=1, length=4, embed=8, heads=2
    x = torch.arange(1*4*8).float().reshape(1, 4, 8)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=2); out = codeflash_output # 14.2μs -> 9.64μs (47.4% faster)
    # Check that values are preserved (flattened then reshaped)
    # The first batch, first head, first length position should match original
    orig = x[0, 0, :].view(2, 4)

def test_basic_reshape_4_heads():
    # Test reshaping with heads=4
    x = torch.arange(2*5*8).float().reshape(2, 5, 8)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=4); out = codeflash_output # 13.7μs -> 8.63μs (59.2% faster)
    # Check that reshaping is correct for a sample value
    orig = x[1, 2, :].view(4, 2)

def test_basic_reshape_heads_equals_embed_dim():
    # Test when heads divides embed_dim exactly, heads=8
    x = torch.arange(3*2*8).float().reshape(3, 2, 8)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=8); out = codeflash_output # 12.9μs -> 8.49μs (52.2% faster)
    # Check that each head gets a single scalar
    orig = x[2, 1, :]

# --- Edge Test Cases ---

def test_embed_dim_not_divisible_by_heads():
    # Test when embed_dim is not divisible by heads (should raise)
    x = torch.randn(1, 2, 7)
    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError):
        reshape_tensor(x, heads=3) # 40.8μs -> 42.1μs (3.03% slower)



def test_one_head():
    # Test with heads=1 (no splitting)
    x = torch.arange(2*3*6).float().reshape(2, 3, 6)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=1); out = codeflash_output # 14.3μs -> 12.2μs (17.0% faster)

def test_one_element_tensor():
    # Test with a single element tensor
    x = torch.tensor([[[42.0]]])  # shape (1, 1, 1)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=1); out = codeflash_output # 14.9μs -> 13.0μs (14.3% faster)

def test_negative_heads():
    # Test with negative heads (should raise)
    x = torch.randn(1, 2, 8)
    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError):
        reshape_tensor(x, heads=-2) # 59.4μs -> 59.6μs (0.406% slower)

def test_heads_zero():
    # Test with heads=0 (should raise)
    x = torch.randn(1, 2, 8)
    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError):
        reshape_tensor(x, heads=0) # 30.2μs -> 30.9μs (2.07% slower)

def test_non_3d_input():
    # Test with input tensor not 3D (should raise)
    x = torch.randn(2, 8)
    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
        reshape_tensor(x, heads=2) # 3.85μs -> 3.91μs (1.61% slower)

def test_heads_larger_than_embed_dim():
    # heads > embed_dim, should fail
    x = torch.randn(1, 2, 4)
    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError):
        reshape_tensor(x, heads=8) # 35.9μs -> 36.6μs (1.96% slower)

# --- Large Scale Test Cases ---

def test_large_tensor_reshape():
    # Test with a large tensor, but <100MB
    # 1000*10*10 float32 = 400,000 bytes = 0.4MB
    x = torch.randn(1000, 10, 10)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=5); out = codeflash_output # 27.4μs -> 19.5μs (40.5% faster)
    # Check that reshaping is consistent for a random sample
    for b in [0, 999]:
        for l in [0, 9]:
            orig = x[b, l, :].view(5, 2)

def test_large_tensor_heads_equals_embed_dim():
    # heads == embed_dim, each head gets 1 value
    x = torch.randn(100, 20, 8)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=8); out = codeflash_output # 18.6μs -> 12.7μs (46.1% faster)
    # Check for a sample
    orig = x[99, 19, :]

def test_large_tensor_heads_one():
    # heads=1, no splitting
    x = torch.randn(500, 10, 16)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=1); out = codeflash_output # 17.2μs -> 15.3μs (12.1% faster)
    # Should match original in last dimension
    for b in [0, 499]:
        for l in [0, 9]:
            pass



def test_dtype_preservation():
    # Ensure dtype is preserved
    x = torch.ones(2, 3, 4, dtype=torch.int32)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=2); out = codeflash_output # 29.4μs -> 19.6μs (49.9% faster)

def test_device_preservation_cpu():
    # Ensure device is preserved (CPU)
    x = torch.ones(2, 3, 4)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=2); out = codeflash_output # 18.4μs -> 13.1μs (40.3% faster)

@pytest.mark.skipif(not torch.cuda.is_available(), reason="CUDA not available")

def test_contiguous_output():
    # Output should be contiguous
    x = torch.randn(2, 3, 4)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=2); out = codeflash_output # 24.1μs -> 17.2μs (39.8% faster)

def test_float_precision():
    # Test float64 precision
    x = torch.arange(2*2*4, dtype=torch.float64).reshape(2, 2, 4)
    codeflash_output = reshape_tensor(x, heads=2); out = codeflash_output # 14.9μs -> 10.1μs (48.5% faster)
    orig = x[1, 1, :].view(2, 2)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-reshape_tensor-mhwtibw5 and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization replaces three separate tensor operations with a single chained operation. The original code performs `view()`, `transpose(1, 2)`, and `reshape()` sequentially, while the optimized version combines the view and transpose into `view().permute(0, 2, 1, 3)`.

**Key changes:**
- Eliminates the intermediate `transpose()` and final `reshape()` operations
- Uses `permute(0, 2, 1, 3)` which directly achieves the same axis rearrangement as the original transpose+reshape sequence
- Reduces from 4 tensor operations to 2 operations

**Why it's faster:**
- Fewer intermediate tensor allocations and memory operations
- `permute()` can be more efficient than separate `transpose()` and `reshape()` calls
- Reduces function call overhead by combining operations

**Impact on workloads:**
Based on the function reference, `reshape_tensor` is called three times per forward pass in an attention mechanism (for q, k, v tensors). Since this appears to be in a neural network's attention layer, the function likely executes frequently during model inference/training. The 19% speedup will compound across these multiple calls per forward pass.

**Test case performance:**
The optimization shows consistent 40-70% improvements across most test cases, with particularly strong gains on larger tensors and edge cases where heads equals the embedding dimension. Even error cases show minimal overhead, maintaining the same exception behavior while being slightly faster in most cases.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 November 13, 2025 02:36
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Nov 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant