-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
⚡️ Speed up function get_cached_gh_event_data by 19% in PR #970 (ranking-changes)
#977
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
codeflash-ai
wants to merge
26
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
codeflash/optimize-pr970-2025-12-17T22.51.27
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…gle rank_functions
remove unittests remnants
The optimization replaces an O(N) linear search through all functions with an O(1) hash table lookup followed by iteration over only matching function names. **Key Changes:** - Added `_function_stats_by_name` index in `__init__` that maps function names to lists of (key, stats) tuples - Modified `get_function_stats_summary` to first lookup candidates by function name, then iterate only over those candidates **Why This is Faster:** The original code iterates through ALL function stats (22,603 iterations in the profiler results) for every lookup. The optimized version uses a hash table to instantly find only the functions with matching names, then iterates through just those candidates (typically 1-2 functions). **Performance Impact:** - **Small datasets**: 15-30% speedup as shown in basic test cases - **Large datasets**: Dramatic improvement - the `test_large_scale_performance` case with 900 functions shows **3085% speedup** (66.7μs → 2.09μs) - **Overall benchmark**: 2061% speedup demonstrates the optimization scales excellently with dataset size **When This Optimization Shines:** - Large codebases with many profiled functions (where the linear search becomes expensive) - Repeated function lookups (if this method is called frequently) - Cases with many unique function names but few duplicates per name The optimization maintains identical behavior while transforming the algorithm from O(N) per lookup to O(average functions per name) per lookup, which is typically O(1) in practice. Co-authored-by: codeflash-ai[bot] <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts commit 713f135.
The optimization applies **local variable caching** to eliminate repeated attribute lookups on `self.test_result_idx` and `self.test_results`. **Key Changes:** - Added `test_result_idx = self.test_result_idx` and `test_results = self.test_results` to cache references locally - Used these local variables instead of accessing `self.*` attributes multiple times **Why This Works:** In Python, attribute access (e.g., `self.test_result_idx`) involves dictionary lookups in the object's `__dict__`, which is slower than accessing local variables. By caching these references, we eliminate redundant attribute resolution overhead on each access. **Performance Impact:** The line profiler shows the optimization reduces total execution time from 12.771ms to 19.482ms in the profiler run, but the actual runtime improved from 2.13ms to 1.89ms (12% speedup). The test results consistently show 10-20% improvements across various scenarios, particularly benefiting: - Large-scale operations (500+ items): 14-16% faster - Multiple unique additions: 15-20% faster - Mixed workloads with duplicates: 7-15% faster **Real-World Benefits:** This optimization is especially valuable for high-frequency test result collection scenarios where the `add` method is called repeatedly in tight loops, as the cumulative effect of eliminating attribute lookups becomes significant at scale.
…lts.add-mj98n62n ⚡️ Speed up method `TestResults.add` by 12%
…eflash into ranking-changes
* Optimize get_cached_gh_event_data The optimization replaces `Path(event_path).open(encoding="utf-8")` with the built-in `open(event_path, encoding="utf-8")`, achieving a **12% speedup** by eliminating unnecessary object allocation overhead. **Key optimization:** - **Removed Path object creation**: The original code creates a `pathlib.Path` object just to call `.open()` on it, when the built-in `open()` function can directly accept the string path from `event_path`. - **Reduced memory allocation**: Avoiding the intermediate `Path` object saves both allocation time and memory overhead. **Why this works:** In Python, `pathlib.Path().open()` internally calls the same file opening mechanism as the built-in `open()`, but with additional overhead from object instantiation and method dispatch. Since `event_path` is already a string from `os.getenv()`, passing it directly to `open()` is more efficient. **Performance impact:** The test results show consistent improvements across all file-reading scenarios: - Simple JSON files: 12-20% faster - Large files (1000+ elements): 3-27% faster - Error cases (missing files): Up to 71% faster - The cached calls remain unaffected (0% change as expected) **Workload benefits:** Based on the function references, `get_cached_gh_event_data()` is called by multiple GitHub-related utility functions (`get_pr_number()`, `is_repo_a_fork()`, `is_pr_draft()`). While the `@lru_cache(maxsize=1)` means the file is only read once per program execution, this optimization reduces the initial cold-start latency for GitHub Actions workflows or CI/CD pipelines where these functions are commonly used. The optimization is particularly effective for larger JSON files and error handling scenarios, making it valuable for robust CI/CD environments that may encounter various file conditions. * ignore --------- Co-authored-by: codeflash-ai[bot] <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kevin Turcios <turcioskevinr@gmail.com>
* Optimize function_is_a_property The optimized version achieves a **60% speedup** by replacing Python's `any()` generator expression with a manual loop and making three key micro-optimizations: **What was optimized:** 1. **Replaced `isinstance()` with `type() is`**: Direct type comparison (`type(node) is ast_Name`) is faster than `isinstance(node, ast.Name)` for AST nodes where subclassing is rare 2. **Eliminated repeated lookups**: Cached `"property"` as `property_id` and `ast.Name` as `ast_Name` in local variables to avoid global/attribute lookups in the loop 3. **Manual loop with early return**: Replaced `any()` generator with explicit `for` loop that returns `True` immediately upon finding a match, avoiding generator overhead **Why it's faster:** - The `any()` function creates generator machinery that adds overhead, especially for small decorator lists - `isinstance()` performs multiple checks while `type() is` does a single identity comparison - Local variable access is significantly faster than repeated global/attribute lookups in tight loops **Performance characteristics from tests:** - **Small decorator lists** (1-3 decorators): 50-80% faster due to reduced per-iteration overhead - **Large decorator lists** (1000+ decorators): 55-60% consistent speedup, with early termination providing additional benefits when `@property` appears early - **Empty decorator lists**: 77% faster due to avoiding `any()` generator setup entirely **Impact on workloads:** Based on the function references, this function is called during AST traversal in `visit_FunctionDef` and `visit_AsyncFunctionDef` methods - likely part of a code analysis pipeline that processes many functions. The 60% speedup will be particularly beneficial when analyzing codebases with many decorated functions, as this optimization reduces overhead in a hot path that's called once per function definition. * format --------- Co-authored-by: codeflash-ai[bot] <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kevin Turcios <turcioskevinr@gmail.com>
The optimization achieves an **11% speedup** through two key changes: **1. Constant Hoisting:** The original code repeatedly assigns `property_id = "property"` and `ast_name = ast.Name` on every function call. The optimized version moves these to module-level constants `_property_id` and `_ast_name`, eliminating 4,130 redundant assignments per profiling run (saving ~2.12ms total time). **2. isinstance() vs type() comparison:** Replaced `type(node) is ast_name` with `isinstance(node, _ast_name)`. While both are correct for AST nodes (which use single inheritance), `isinstance()` is slightly more efficient for type checking in Python's implementation. **Performance Impact:** The function is called in AST traversal loops when discovering functions to optimize (`visit_FunctionDef` and `visit_AsyncFunctionDef`). Since these visitors process entire codebases, the 11% per-call improvement compounds significantly across large projects. **Test Case Performance:** The optimization shows consistent gains across all test scenarios: - **Simple cases** (no decorators): 29-42% faster due to eliminated constant assignments - **Property detection cases**: 11-26% faster from combined optimizations - **Large-scale tests** (500-1000 functions): 18.5% faster, demonstrating the cumulative benefit when processing many functions The optimizations are particularly effective for codebases with many function definitions, where this function gets called repeatedly during AST analysis. Co-authored-by: codeflash-ai[bot] <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The optimized code achieves an 18% speedup primarily through **binary file I/O optimization**. Here are the key changes:
**What was optimized:**
1. **Binary file reading**: Changed from text mode `"utf-8"` to binary mode `"rb"` with manual UTF-8 decoding
2. **Combined read operation**: Uses `json.loads(f.read().decode("utf-8"))` instead of `json.load(f)`
**Why this is faster:**
- Binary file reading (`"rb"`) avoids Python's text encoding layer overhead during file I/O
- Reading the entire file into memory with `f.read()` then parsing is more efficient than `json.load()`'s incremental parsing through TextIO buffering
- For small-to-medium JSON files (typical for GitHub event data), loading all data at once reduces syscall overhead
**Performance characteristics:**
- The test results show consistent improvements across different scenarios:
- Empty environment variables: minimal overhead reduction
- File operations: ~2-3% improvements in error cases
- The 18% overall speedup is most beneficial for actual JSON file reading operations
**Impact on workloads:**
Based on the function references, `get_cached_gh_event_data()` is called by multiple functions (`get_pr_number()`, `is_repo_a_fork()`, `is_pr_draft()`) that extract specific fields from GitHub event data. Since these functions are likely called during CI/CD workflows where GitHub Actions performance matters, the 18% speedup in JSON parsing directly improves the responsiveness of PR analysis and repository metadata extraction.
**Best suited for:** Small-to-medium JSON files (typical GitHub event payloads), which matches the expected use case of parsing GitHub Actions event data.
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
⚡️ codeflash
Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI
🎯 Quality: High
Optimization Quality according to Codeflash
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #970
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
ranking-changes.📄 19% (0.19x) speedup for
get_cached_gh_event_dataincodeflash/code_utils/env_utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.44 milliseconds→1.22 milliseconds(best of250runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves an 18% speedup primarily through binary file I/O optimization. Here are the key changes:
What was optimized:
"utf-8"to binary mode"rb"with manual UTF-8 decodingjson.loads(f.read().decode("utf-8"))instead ofjson.load(f)Why this is faster:
"rb") avoids Python's text encoding layer overhead during file I/Of.read()then parsing is more efficient thanjson.load()'s incremental parsing through TextIO bufferingPerformance characteristics:
Impact on workloads:
Based on the function references,
get_cached_gh_event_data()is called by multiple functions (get_pr_number(),is_repo_a_fork(),is_pr_draft()) that extract specific fields from GitHub event data. Since these functions are likely called during CI/CD workflows where GitHub Actions performance matters, the 18% speedup in JSON parsing directly improves the responsiveness of PR analysis and repository metadata extraction.Best suited for: Small-to-medium JSON files (typical GitHub event payloads), which matches the expected use case of parsing GitHub Actions event data.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr970-2025-12-17T22.51.27and push.