⚡️ Speed up method OneNoteDataSource.me_onenote_update_notebooks by 9%
#1108
+32
−36
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 9% (0.09x) speedup for
OneNoteDataSource.me_onenote_update_notebooksinbackend/python/app/sources/external/microsoft/one_note/one_note.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.03 milliseconds→944 microseconds(best of73runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 9% runtime improvement through two key optimizations focused on eliminating redundant operations and reordering checks for better performance:
1. Response Handler Optimization (
_handle_onenote_response)isinstance(response, dict)check beforehasattr()calls since dictionary type checking and key lookup ('error' in response) is faster than attribute reflection viahasattr()successanderror_msgvariables for the success path, directly constructing the final response2. Request Configuration Optimization (
me_onenote_update_notebooks)RequestConfigurationobjects (query_paramsandconfig), but the optimized version reuses a singleconfigobject, reducing memory allocation overheadselect/expandlist conversion logic outside the conditional blocks to avoid repeated type checking and list creation.copy()when assigning headers to prevent mutation of the input reference while maintaining the same behaviorPerformance Impact Analysis:
The line profiler shows the response handler improved from 1.47ms to 0.99ms (32% faster), while the main function improved from 6.51ms to 5.44ms (16% faster). These optimizations are particularly effective for high-frequency OneNote API operations since they reduce the per-call overhead of object creation and attribute lookups.
Test Case Benefits:
The optimizations show consistent improvements across all test scenarios, with the most benefit in concurrent execution tests (large-scale and throughput tests) where the reduced object allocation overhead compounds across multiple simultaneous operations.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-OneNoteDataSource.me_onenote_update_notebooks-mjbn7qi9and push.