Feat/ext langgraph checkpoint

[CasperGN]

Description

Extending dapr-ext-langgraph to expand on the handling for put, put_writes and get_tuple to conform with the native LangGraph RedisSaver. This ensures that the demo's presented in the LangGraph Academy are functional.

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: N/A

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

• Code compiles correctly
• Created/updated tests
• Extended the documentation

[acroca]

@CasperGN Please have a look at other examples in the examples directory and follow the same pattern. Specially the following:

• The examples are runnable using mechanical markdown, you'll see the commands in the README.md. We run those files in our CI.
• You should only need requirements.txt, the python files, the components and the readme. Check for example the workflow and the demo_workflow examples as a reference.
• Hook your example in the CI, you'll find the list in the tox.ini

[CasperGN]

@acroca I've done the above and verified it runs locally with the validate.sh script.
This does however need the environment variable OPENAI_API_KEY to be present in order to run the example - how do we go about adding that?

[CasperGN]

@acroca can you try to trigger CI to see if pulling a small llama model to be used for tests is too slow?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.55556% with 53 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 87.04%. Comparing base (bffb749) to head (45262f5).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...-langgraph/dapr/ext/langgraph/dapr_checkpointer.py	64.90%	53 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #868      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.63%   87.04%   +0.41%     
==========================================
  Files          84      100      +16     
  Lines        4473     6629    +2156     
==========================================
+ Hits         3875     5770    +1895     
- Misses        598      859     +261     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[CasperGN]

@acroca do you want me to add the conditional run for the ext packages and ollama in this PR or should I rather add this in a follow up?

I'll also need to do a follow up to implement the delete function similar to the changes in this one

[acroca]

@acroca do you want me to add the conditional run for the ext packages and ollama in this PR or should I rather add this in a follow up?

I'll also need to do a follow up to implement the delete function similar to the changes in this one

This PR adds roughly 2.5min to the CI build, right? I think it'd be good to split in a different runs, but I also want to experiment with running each validation in a different step to run.
Maybe let's merge as is, and we can improve CI runs in a separate PR.

[CasperGN]

@acroca do you want me to add the conditional run for the ext packages and ollama in this PR or should I rather add this in a follow up?
I'll also need to do a follow up to implement the delete function similar to the changes in this one

This PR adds roughly 2.5min to the CI build, right? I think it'd be good to split in a different runs, but I also want to experiment with running each validation in a different step to run. Maybe let's merge as is, and we can improve CI runs in a separate PR.

Yeah and considering we'd be carrying more ext- packages in we should also have a conditional check on these so we don't have to pull ollama + llama3.2 every single time but only when the ext packages that needs it requires testing