feat: aggregate SecurityPolicy status from edge - #311
Draft
ecv wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
SecurityPolicies in project control planes did not surface their edge status because no Karmada ResourceInterpreterCustomization aggregated SecurityPolicy status from member clusters back to the hub. Add a statusAggregation customization for gateway.envoyproxy.io/v1alpha1 SecurityPolicy, modeled on the existing BackendTrafficPolicy block. SecurityPolicy uses the Gateway API PolicyStatus shape, so aggregation copies status.ancestors from the first member status item. Closes #97
5 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a Karmada
ResourceInterpreterCustomizationthat aggregatesgateway.envoyproxy.io/v1alpha1SecurityPolicy status from member clusters back to the hub, so SecurityPolicies in project control planes surface their edge status condition.SecurityPolicy uses the Gateway API
PolicyStatusshape (status.ancestors[].conditions), identical to BackendTrafficPolicy, so the new block is modeled verbatim on the existing BackendTrafficPolicy interpreter and copiesstatus.ancestors.Closes #97