Add LDAP feature support - #6
Open
davidpil2002 wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
davidpil2002
force-pushed
the
dev-add-ldap-support
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 24, 2023 08:14
3593baf to
c1cc33c
Compare
davidpil2002
force-pushed
the
dev-add-ldap-support
branch
3 times, most recently
from
December 3, 2023 10:22
e34d037 to
d3ac900
Compare
davidpil2002
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2023
Why I did it Advance dhcpmon to a3c5381 in 202305 branch. a3c5381 - (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) Merge pull request src: Add libnl3 build.sh script sonic-net#11 from jcaiMR/dev/jcai_fix_err_log (11 days ago) [StormLiangMS] c5ef7e7 - Change common_libs dependencies from buster to bullseye (Updating docker-orchagent/syncd Dockerfile and start.sh #9) 824a144 - replace atoi with strtol (Rename hostname #6) (10 weeks ago) [Mai Bui] 32c0c3f - Fix libswsscommon package installation for non-amd64 (README.md leaves out docker-database #7) (10 weeks ago) [Saikrishna Arcot] Work item tracking Microsoft ADO (25048723): How I did it How to verify it Run test_dhcp_relay.py, no failure
davidpil2002
force-pushed
the
dev-add-ldap-support
branch
6 times, most recently
from
December 25, 2023 14:20
4343811 to
4ea585d
Compare
davidpil2002
force-pushed
the
dev-add-ldap-support
branch
2 times, most recently
from
February 29, 2024 08:01
9485c3b to
31c62b6
Compare
davidpil2002
force-pushed
the
dev-add-ldap-support
branch
from
March 5, 2024 08:33
31c62b6 to
4f7f048
Compare
davidpil2002
force-pushed
the
dev-add-ldap-support
branch
from
March 18, 2024 10:20
08ca0bc to
65d17d7
Compare
davidpil2002
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2025
…et#21095) Adding the below fix from FRR FRRouting/frr#17297 This is to fix the following crash which is a statistical issue [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `/usr/lib/frr/zebra -A 127.0.0.1 -s 90000000 -M dplane_fpm_nl -M snmp'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007fccd7351e2c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fccd6faf7c0 (LWP 36))] (gdb) bt #0 0x00007fccd7351e2c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007fccd7302fb2 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007fccd72ed472 in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007fccd75bb3a9 in _zlog_assert_failed (xref=xref@entry=0x7fccd7652380 <_xref.16>, extra=extra@entry=0x0) at ../lib/zlog.c:678 #4 0x00007fccd759b2fe in route_node_delete (node=<optimized out>) at ../lib/table.c:352 #5 0x00007fccd759b445 in route_unlock_node (node=0x0) at ../lib/table.h:258 #6 route_next (node=<optimized out>) at ../lib/table.c:436 #7 route_next (node=node@entry=0x56029d89e560) at ../lib/table.c:410 #8 0x000056029b6b6b7a in if_lookup_by_name_per_ns (ns=ns@entry=0x56029d873d90, ifname=ifname@entry=0x7fccc0029340 "PortChannel1020") at ../zebra/interface.c:312 #9 0x000056029b6b8b36 in zebra_if_dplane_ifp_handling (ctx=0x7fccc0029310) at ../zebra/interface.c:1867 sonic-net#10 zebra_if_dplane_result (ctx=0x7fccc0029310) at ../zebra/interface.c:2221 sonic-net#11 0x000056029b7137a9 in rib_process_dplane_results (thread=<optimized out>) at ../zebra/zebra_rib.c:4810 sonic-net#12 0x00007fccd75a0e0d in thread_call (thread=thread@entry=0x7ffe8e553cc0) at ../lib/thread.c:1990 sonic-net#13 0x00007fccd7559368 in frr_run (master=0x56029d65a040) at ../lib/libfrr.c:1198 sonic-net#14 0x000056029b6ac317 in main (argc=9, argv=0x7ffe8e5540d8) at ../zebra/main.c:478
davidpil2002
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2026
…dating udevd rules (sonic-net#26343) - Why I did it On SONiC SmartSwitch platforms with DPUs, systemd-udevd crashes with SIGABRT on every reboot when DPU firmware initialization is slow. During the initramfs boot phase, a standalone systemd-udevd daemon is started to handle device discovery. If DPU firmware takes longer than the 60-second udevadm settle timeout (BlueField-3 DPUs can take 120 seconds each in the failure case when they are stuck), the initramfs cannot stop this udevd before switch_root. The stale process survives into the real system but is never chrooted into the overlayfs root, leaving it with a broken filesystem view. When dpu-udev-manager.sh writes udev rules, the stale udevd detects the change and crashes on an assertion in systemd's chase() path resolution (assert(path_is_absolute(p)) at chase.c:648), because dir_fd_is_root() returns false for a process whose root still points to the initramfs rootfs rather than the overlayfs. This triggers a systemd issue : systemd/systemd#29559 which maintainers doesn't consider as a bug from systemd side. Raising this fix for our usecase. Core was generated by `/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd --daemon --resolve-names=never'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007f29fe7f695c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f29fe7f695c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007f29fe7a1cc2 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007f29fe78a4ac in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007f29fea50c11 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #4 0x00007f29feb94a8b in chase () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #5 0x00007f29feb956e2 in chase_and_opendir () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #6 0x00007f29feb9a609 in conf_files_list_strv () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #7 0x00007f29fea913e8 in config_get_stats_by_path () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so #8 0x0000559f295519cf in ?? () #9 0x0000559f29553a77 in ?? () sonic-net#10 0x00007f29fec36055 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so sonic-net#11 0x00007f29fec3668d in sd_event_dispatch () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so sonic-net#12 0x00007f29fec394a8 in sd_event_run () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so sonic-net#13 0x00007f29fec396c7 in sd_event_loop () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.so sonic-net#14 0x0000559f29545820 in ?? () sonic-net#15 0x00007f29fe78bca8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 sonic-net#16 0x00007f29fe78bd65 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 sonic-net#17 0x0000559f29545c51 in ?? () - How I did it Added a kill_stale_udevd() function to dpu-udev-manager.sh that runs before writing the udev rules. It identifies the systemd-managed udevd PID via systemctl show, then kills any other systemd-udevd --daemon process that doesn't match -- these are leftover initramfs instances. If no stale process exists (e.g. DPUs are healthy and the initramfs udevd exited cleanly), the function is a no-op. - How to verify it Deploy the image on a SmartSwitch with DPUs in a state where firmware initialization times out (>60s per DPU) by stopping image installation before firmware install step Reboot the switch Verify no new systemd-udevd coredumps in /var/core/ Verify the stale process was killed: journalctl -b 0 | grep dpu-udev-manager should show killing stale initramfs udevd PID (systemd udevd is PID ) Verify systemd-udevd.service is healthy: systemctl status systemd-udevd should show active (running) Verify DPU udev rules were written: cat /etc/udev/rules.d/92-midplane-intf.rules should contain the DPU interface naming rules Signed-off-by: Hemanth Kumar Tirupati <tirupatihemanthkumar@gmail.com>
davidpil2002
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2026
…ically (sonic-net#27620) #### Why I did it src/sonic-redfish ``` * c11fe4e - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Add Redfish API and gtest frameworks (#6) (33 hours ago) [Chinmoy Dey] ``` #### How I did it #### How to verify it #### Description for the changelog
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I did it
Work item tracking
How I did it
How to verify it
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
Description for the changelog
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)