docs: add missing ws field to HealthResponse.checks in OpenAPI spec#157
docs: add missing ws field to HealthResponse.checks in OpenAPI spec#1570x-SquidSol wants to merge 1 commit intodcccrypto:mainfrom
Conversation
The /health endpoint returns a `ws` boolean in the checks object (health.ts:24) indicating WebSocket subsystem status, but the HealthResponse schema only documented `db` and `rpc`. Clients doing strict schema validation would flag the extra field. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 4 minutes and 7 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
1 participant
Summary
/healthreturnschecks.ws(boolean) indicating WebSocket subsystem health, but theHealthResponseschema only documenteddbandrpc. Strict schema validation would flag the undocumented field.wsboolean property toHealthResponse.checkswith description.Test plan
vitest runpasses (186/186 tests)🤖 Generated with Claude Code