Fix sixel transparency#937
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
I decided to slightly complicate the wrapping of Sixel images in AnyPlex. I decided to kill two birds with one stone: quality and the lack of alpha transparency support in JPEGs.
Hybrid Image Encoding: PNG vs. JPEG+Mask
The primary goal of this separation is to optimize the balance between asset file size and visual fidelity across different image types and scales. The choice of encoding method changes at the 4096-pixel threshold based on the following technical motivations:
1. Why Smaller Assets ($\leq 4096$ ) Use Pure PNG
2. Why Larger Assets ($> 4096$ ) Use JPEG + Alpha Mask
Statistical Context