Skip to content

Conversation

@emir89
Copy link
Contributor

@emir89 emir89 commented Nov 21, 2024

No description provided.

@emir89 emir89 requested a review from haschek November 21, 2024 06:53
@emir89 emir89 marked this pull request as draft November 25, 2024 05:57
@emir89 emir89 marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 08:57
@emir89 emir89 marked this pull request as draft November 27, 2024 13:23
@haschek haschek changed the base branch from next to develop December 17, 2024 07:58
@emir89 emir89 marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 08:28
@emir89 emir89 force-pushed the feature/codemirror-upgrades-CMEM-5464 branch from bc631ee to ae9b95e Compare January 13, 2025 09:23
@emir89 emir89 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 09:24
@emir89 emir89 force-pushed the feature/codemirror-upgrades-CMEM-5464 branch from ae9b95e to 29e32eb Compare January 13, 2025 11:47
@emir89 emir89 marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 14:27
Copy link
Member

@haschek haschek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the review for CMEM-6194 (disabled/intent).

Copy link
Member

@haschek haschek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2nd review for CMEM-6194 (disabled/intent).

Copy link
Member

@haschek haschek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. review for CMEM-5464 (linting).

@haschek haschek changed the base branch from develop to release/v24.1.0 February 4, 2025 14:40
@haschek haschek merged commit 44932f5 into release/v24.1.0 Feb 4, 2025
8 checks passed
@haschek haschek deleted the feature/codemirror-upgrades-CMEM-5464 branch February 11, 2025 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants