[UPDATE] Replace output's name with id for data management #12
+288
−177
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What it does
Until now, we have utilized output names (e.g., "CPU Usage" or "Disk I/O View") to manage data frames inside the modules. Although this methodology seems to work fine, it becomes problematic for cases where we have multiple outputs with the same name. For instance, when fetching an LTTng trace (kernel + UST) from the trace server, we might get two "Memory Usage" outputs, one is for the kernel's memory usage and the other one comes from the UST.
As of now, we use the output's id for this matter, enabling us to accurately differentiate the outputs from each other as each output has its own unique id.
How to test
You can either run the tests using
pytest -v, or check the results/graphs/interpretations of each ML module (e.g., Anomaly Detection, Capacity Planning, etc.).Follow-ups
N/A
Review checklist