Skip to content

Conversation

@tintou
Copy link
Member

@tintou tintou commented May 7, 2018

Fixes #1390

@tintou
Copy link
Member Author

tintou commented May 7, 2018

TODO: add the transitional package.

@cassidyjames
Copy link
Contributor

@danrabbit do we want to pursue this before release?

@danirabbit
Copy link
Member

@cassidyjames probably not worth it tbh

@ryonakano
Copy link
Member

TODO: add the transitional package.

@tintou I addressed the above TODO in 284118c. Please comment if I'm missing something or incorrect.

@ryonakano ryonakano added this to OS 9 Nov 25, 2025
@ryonakano ryonakano moved this to Needs Review in OS 9 Nov 25, 2025
@ryonakano ryonakano moved this from In Progress to Needs Review in RDNN all the things Nov 25, 2025
@ryonakano ryonakano requested a review from a team November 25, 2025 08:08
As recommended in https://wiki.debian.org/RenamingPackages

> Please make sure that you use the proper version to break against.
> You must make sure that you break against all versions which still
> have the files in the old package.
As in https://wiki.debian.org/RenamingPackages

> Note that the package does not contain any architecture specific files anymore
> and therefore the Architecture is set to all, even if it was any before.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Needs Review
Status: Needs Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants