-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: ETU-75494 Lifecycle #117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
egrimstad
wants to merge
3
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feat/ETU-75494-lifecycle
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+165
−13
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
| module.exports = (targetVal, options, context) => { | ||
| if (typeof targetVal !== "string") { | ||
| return [{ message: "Must be a valid calendar date."}] | ||
| } | ||
| if (targetVal.match(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/) == null) { | ||
| return [{ message: "Must be a valid calendar date."}] | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (isNaN(Date.parse(targetVal))) { | ||
| return [{ message: "Must be a valid calendar date."}] | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return [] | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if all teams can commit to a specific
x-sunsetdate when they deprecate something.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, might be. But also, maybe we should encourage setting it? The normal time frame is one year, so they could set that as a "default" and then push it later if they need to.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would make things more predictable for consumers. Seeing a deprecated API with no indication of sunsetting, feels a bit like it not being deprecated at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose in practice a team would have to book the
x-sunsetdate into their calendar one year ahead of time, if they are going to execute it properly. Otherwise it will just be forgotten and picked back up again at some random point in time. So I feel like forcingx-sunsetfor deprecated resource won't really be meaningfully more accurate for consumers than the already well known 1 year deadline?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, yes, this is a way to indicate the well known 1 year deadline. How would the consumers know that one year has passed since the deprecation happened? I suppose they could dig through the changelog to find it, but it seems much simpler to have it indicated in the specification itself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And teams don't have to book it into the calendar, we can give them a nudge :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you write a bit more about this in the guidelines?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, definitely.