enhance(ci): Add EIP Tracker Issue Template

[marioevz]

🗒️ Description

Adds a tracker issue template for EIPs to help better monitor the specification and testing progress.

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

N/A.

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast tox checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  uvx tox -e static

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered adding an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).
• Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.
• Tests: For PRs implementing a missed test case, update the post-mortem document to add an entry the list.
• Ported Tests: All converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests or tests/static have been assigned @ported_from marker.

Cute Animal Picture

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.87%. Comparing base (2f15886) to head (835f449).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on forks/osaka.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           forks/osaka    #1847   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        83.87%   83.87%           
============================================
  Files              402      402           
  Lines            25101    25101           
  Branches          2285     2285           
============================================
  Hits             21053    21053           
  Misses            3609     3609           
  Partials           439      439           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	83.87% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Carsons-Eels]

Some initial thoughts/suggestions

[spencer-tb]

I think adding a phase 1 (CFI'd) & phase 2 (SFI'd) to the Process Status section could be nice! Phase 1 would be for initial tests, and included in the devnet. Phase 2 would be for. spec/test coverage reviewed by 2 EELS / 2 EEST / 1 EIP author, extra tests added and passing, EIP successful in first testnet.

We could add a regressions section to. For significant changes, whether there are issues that come up during a devnet, missed test coverage or even whether the EIP is pulled out of the fork (and the reasons why).

Let me know what you think! Happy to merge now and get the process going nonetheless.

[fselmo]

looks great, ty! 🙏🏼