This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 11, 2019. It is now read-only.
Fix issues with pear info and encodings#79
Merged
alvagante merged 1 commit intoexample42:masterfrom Jan 9, 2015
mscharley:master
Merged
Fix issues with pear info and encodings#79alvagante merged 1 commit intoexample42:masterfrom mscharley:master
pear info and encodings#79alvagante merged 1 commit intoexample42:masterfrom
mscharley:master
Conversation
alvagante
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2015
Fix issues with `pear info` and encodings
Member
|
Thank you |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oops, that's an excellent question. There's supposed to be a literal '>' in that command line, not a redirect like there is currently.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #68 without using iconv as per #78. Perhaps a better solution than #73 (which I only found after writing this) since it uses pear's built-in installation check rather than relying on
pear info. As someone having the issues identified in #68, I can confirm this works properly with drush.