Skip to content

Sync problem specs#450

Open
BNAndras wants to merge 2 commits intoexercism:mainfrom
BNAndras:sync-problem-specs
Open

Sync problem specs#450
BNAndras wants to merge 2 commits intoexercism:mainfrom
BNAndras:sync-problem-specs

Conversation

@BNAndras
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@BNAndras BNAndras requested a review from a team January 30, 2026 02:14
@BNAndras BNAndras added the x:rep/tiny Tiny amount of reputation label Jan 30, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR touches files which potentially affect the outcome of the tests of an exercise. This will cause all students' solutions to affected exercises to be re-tested.

If this PR does not affect the result of the test (or, for example, adds an edge case that is not worth rerunning all tests for), please add the following to the merge-commit message which will stops student's tests from re-running. Please copy-paste to avoid typos.

[no important files changed]

For more information, refer to the documentation. If you are unsure whether to add the message or not, please ping @exercism/maintainers-admin in a comment. Thank you!

(test-equal? "Smallest abundant number"
(classify 12)
'abundant)
(test-exn "zero is rejected"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like an unfortunate addition since it will break existing solutions and isn't an interesting case.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can mark the input validation tests as not included since they technically weren’t until I added them here. It’s not a big deal to me to remove them as long as they are marked as not included in the toml.

(test-equal? "Large abundant number"
(classify 33550335)
'abundant)))
(test-exn "negative integer is rejected"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Likewise.

Copy link
Contributor

@blakelewis blakelewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't like the added input validation but I suppose that it's too late now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

x:rep/tiny Tiny amount of reputation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants