Skip to content

Conversation

@sij411
Copy link
Contributor

@sij411 sij411 commented Dec 30, 2025

Summary

Added a manual for @fedify/relay. Related to #359

Notes

Could you check if this documentation contains all information for building relay servers? I'm open to take opinions or recommendations.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @sij411, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a comprehensive manual for @fedify/relay, providing in-depth guidance for developers looking to implement ActivityPub relay servers. The documentation covers everything from initial setup and configuration options to handling subscriptions, managing follower data, and critical security considerations. It also outlines different relay types and offers insights into monitoring and operational best practices, ensuring users can build and maintain robust and secure relay infrastructure.

Highlights

  • New Relay Manual: A comprehensive manual for @fedify/relay has been added, detailing how to set up and configure ActivityPub relay servers.
  • Relay Types Explained: The manual introduces and differentiates between 'Mastodon-style' and 'LitePub-style' relay protocols, offering guidance on compatibility and features.
  • Security and Operations Guidance: Detailed sections on security considerations (signature verification, subscription abuse, content moderation, privacy), storage requirements, and monitoring (logging, OpenTelemetry) are included.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a comprehensive and well-structured manual for @fedify/relay. The documentation is excellent, covering everything from initial setup to advanced topics like security and monitoring. I've provided a couple of suggestions to improve formatting consistency and to make a code example safer and more robust. Overall, this is a great addition to the project's documentation.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@dahlia dahlia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for writing this comprehensive documentation for @fedify/relay! The overall structure is well-organized and covers the essential topics.

However, I have a concern about the Managing followers section that I'd like to discuss.

Comment on lines +231 to +263
### Querying followers

~~~~ typescript twoslash
import type { KvStore } from "@fedify/fedify";
const kv = null as unknown as KvStore;
// ---cut-before---
import type { RelayFollower } from "@fedify/relay";

for await (const entry of kv.list<RelayFollower>(["follower"])) {
console.log(`Follower: ${entry.value.actor["@id"]}`);
console.log(`State: ${entry.value.state}`);
}
~~~~

> [!NOTE]
> The `~KvStore.list()` method requires a `KvStore` implementation that
> supports listing by prefix (Redis, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Deno KV all support
> this).

### Validating follower objects

~~~~ typescript twoslash
import type { KvStore } from "@fedify/fedify";
const kv = null as unknown as KvStore;
// ---cut-before---
import { isRelayFollower } from "@fedify/relay";

for await (const entry of kv.list(["follower"])) {
if (isRelayFollower(entry.value)) {
console.log(`Valid follower in state: ${entry.value.state}`);
}
}
~~~~
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Managing followers section exposes internal implementation details (key patterns like ["follower", actorId] and the raw RelayFollower data structure). This approach has a few concerns:

  1. Encapsulation: Exposing the internal key schema makes it part of the public API contract
  2. Maintenance burden: Changing the storage structure later would become a breaking change
  3. Incomplete API: Direct KvStore access isn't a proper API—it lacks type safety and discoverability

I think we have two options:

  • Option A: Remove this section from the documentation for now, and add it back once we have proper APIs like relay.listFollowers(), relay.getFollower(actorId), etc.

  • Option B: Add these methods to BaseRelay first, then document the proper API instead of raw KvStore access.

What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Option B sounds good, I will be working on that with another PR. (relay.listFollowers() and relay.getFollower(actorId)) How's that sound?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants