Add gfortran 10 to CI#270
Merged
Merged
Conversation
certik
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2020
certik
left a comment
certik
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this change is fine. Thank you!
Member
Author
|
There are several PRs with failed actions due to this issue. Therefore, I will merge it. |
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To solve issues with Github actions (doc deployment) in #261 and #269.
Apparently
gfortran(version 10) was renamedgfortran-10in MacOS. Therefore, I modified the different scripts to consider it correctly.I also added
gfortran-10to the current evaluated versions (7, 8, and 9).