Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #304 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 59.31% 59.31%
=======================================
Files 44 44
Lines 5110 5110
Branches 383 383
=======================================
Hits 3031 3031
Misses 2079 2079
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…in permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: Coverage Initialization and Data Aggregation Issues
This test suite exhibits two coverage-related bugs:
- Duplicate Coverage Initialization: Coverage collection is started redundantly in the
beforeEachhook ofsimple.spec.ts, as it's already initiated globally incoverage.setup.ts. This causes Playwright to throw an error because coverage cannot be started twice on the same page instance. - Race Condition in Coverage Data Aggregation: The
jsCoverageandcssCoveragearrays are shared and accessed concurrently by multiple tests whenfullyParallel: trueis enabled. This race condition can lead to data corruption or loss in the aggregated coverage reports.
packages/mcp-cloudflare-e2e/tests/simple.spec.ts#L4-L21
sentry-mcp/packages/mcp-cloudflare-e2e/tests/simple.spec.ts
Lines 4 to 21 in 350d990
Bug: Incompatible Coverage Tools Conflict
The test:coverage script in packages/mcp-cloudflare-e2e/package.json attempts to use nyc for coverage reporting. This is incompatible as nyc processes Node.js coverage, while Playwright collects browser-based coverage, leading to script failure or incorrect reports.
packages/mcp-cloudflare-e2e/package.json#L1-L22
sentry-mcp/packages/mcp-cloudflare-e2e/package.json
Lines 1 to 22 in 350d990
Was this report helpful? Give feedback by reacting with 👍 or 👎
No description provided.