docs: add planning index consistency review#29
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR adds a landed "Planning Index Consistency Review" design record and integrates it into workflow, contributor, and maintainer checklist docs; it moves TR-010 from backlog to landed design and archive, and fixes relative links in archived backlog documents. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
WORKFLOW.md (1)
157-176: Clear triggers and actionable confirmations.The new Planning Index Consistency Review section provides specific triggers for when to run the review and a well-defined set of minimum confirmations. The integration into the workflow is logical and practical.
One minor observation: Line 175 references "empty-state wording" and "existing house style" without defining these terms or linking to examples. While this may be clear to current maintainers, consider adding a brief definition or cross-reference to help contributors understand what qualifies as consistent "empty-state wording."
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@WORKFLOW.md` around lines 157 - 176, Update the "Planning Index Consistency Review" section to clarify the terms "empty-state wording" and "existing house style": add one-sentence definitions or a cross-reference (e.g., link to a style guide or an "Writing & UI copy" section) so contributors know the expected tone and examples; specifically mention the section title "Planning Index Consistency Review" and the phrases "empty-state wording" and "existing house style" so you can locate and edit the text and either inline a short definition or add a link to the canonical style/example resource.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/design/TR-010-planning-index-consistency-review.md`:
- Around line 121-131: Add the missing TR-010 entry to CHANGELOG.md to complete
Step 4 of the implementation outline: open CHANGELOG.md and append a new entry
titled "TR-010 — Planning Index Consistency Review" that summarizes the change
(doc added, checklist/workflow/contributing updated, backlog archived) and
includes the cycle/date and any relevant links back to
docs/design/TR-010-planning-index-consistency-review.md; ensure the entry
follows the existing CHANGELOG.md formatting and style so it appears consistent
with other entries.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@WORKFLOW.md`:
- Around line 157-176: Update the "Planning Index Consistency Review" section to
clarify the terms "empty-state wording" and "existing house style": add
one-sentence definitions or a cross-reference (e.g., link to a style guide or an
"Writing & UI copy" section) so contributors know the expected tone and
examples; specifically mention the section title "Planning Index Consistency
Review" and the phrases "empty-state wording" and "existing house style" so you
can locate and edit the text and either inline a short definition or add a link
to the canonical style/example resource.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: c55bd55a-959b-4451-84e7-91e5a5298be1
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
CHANGELOG.mdCONTRIBUTING.mdWORKFLOW.mddocs/BACKLOG/README.mddocs/DOCS_CHECKLIST.mddocs/archive/BACKLOG/README.mddocs/archive/BACKLOG/TR-006-docs-maintainer-checklist.mddocs/archive/BACKLOG/TR-010-planning-index-consistency-review.mddocs/design/README.mddocs/design/TR-010-planning-index-consistency-review.mddocs/legends/TR-truth.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- docs/BACKLOG/README.md
|
Addressed the remaining CodeRabbit nit in
@coderabbitai review please 🥕 |
|
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
1 participant
Summary
Verification
Summary by CodeRabbit