Skip to content

Conversation

@Sergiodero
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sergiodero Sergiodero commented Oct 4, 2025

Summary

This PR updates the revision history with the changes adopted in September 2025 for the GTFS Schedule Reference:

Type of change

GTFS Schedule

  • Functional Change
  • Non-Functional Change
  • Documentation Maintenance

GTFS Realtime

  • Specification Change
  • Specification Change (Experimental Field)

Proposed Discussion Period

As an editorial change this PR will remain open for 7 days before merging. As per the new GTFs Governance, no minimum review period is required for Documentation Maintenance Track.

Proposal Update Tracker

Date Update Description
(2025-10-03) PR opened

Checklist

@Sergiodero Sergiodero changed the title Update revision-history.md Update Revision History September 2025 Oct 4, 2025
@Sergiodero Sergiodero requested a review from skalexch October 4, 2025 01:19
@Sergiodero Sergiodero marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2025 01:20
@Sergiodero Sergiodero added Change type: Documentation Maintenance Improvements to clarity, accuracy, and presentation without altering semantics or functionality. GTFS Schedule Issues and Pull Requests that focus on GTFS Schedule labels Oct 4, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@skalexch skalexch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Sergiodero looks good. One tiny detail; a full stop is missing after stops.txt.

@skalexch skalexch self-assigned this Oct 6, 2025
@skalexch skalexch requested a review from etienne0101 October 6, 2025 14:25
@skalexch skalexch merged commit 477ac3d into google:master Oct 10, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Change type: Documentation Maintenance Improvements to clarity, accuracy, and presentation without altering semantics or functionality. GTFS Schedule Issues and Pull Requests that focus on GTFS Schedule

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants