feat(audit): graphql-response+json parsing failure handling #149
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Relevant section: 6.4.2 application/graphql-response+json https://graphql.github.io/graphql-over-http/draft/#sel-FANNNRCAACENz5F https://graphql.github.io/graphql-over-http/draft/#sel-HANNNXFFCAACCP8kC
enisdenjo
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2025
Member
enisdenjo
left a comment
enisdenjo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry for the MIA here. This looks good, thanks!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is adjacent to #145, and adds an audit check matching example 6.4.2.1.1.
Previously, we had no audit check validating that servers using the
application/graphql-response+jsonmedia type SHOULD respond to not well-formed requests with status code400.For reference, here are the relevant parts of the spec:
Sidenote: I didn't find a convention for the audit IDs, so I generated a random one.