Getting in touch#20
Open
eztam- wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Haqatak,
I'm opening this PR to getting in touch with you since I have seen, you are also working on a metal implementation of secp256k1 EC math. I was able to create a fully working implementation for Metall.
If you like, you can use it for your project. If you like, you could also join my project CryptKeySearch which is a fully working replacement of BitCracks functionality but written from scratch. It works fine and even supports Segwit addresses which Bitcrack doesn't. However, the secp256k1 is not optimised for performance. On an M1 Pro I'm just getting about 8 to 14 MKey/s. Unfortunately I don't have enough experience in Metal, MSL/C++ to get a quick gain in performance out of it. Therefore I'd be happy if someone with more experience in that field could have a look at it. Anyway, feel free to use my code in which way you want.