Update Rust crate `insta` to v1.45.1 #8232

hash-worker · 2026-01-01T00:38:55Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
insta (source)	workspace.dependencies	patch	`1.45.0` -> `1.45.1`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

mitsuhiko/insta (insta)

`v1.45.1`

Compare Source

Fix backward compatibility with TOML format produced by insta < 1.45.0. #849 (@chitoku-k)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

cursor · 2026-01-01T00:39:01Z

PR Summary

Dependency updates (lockfile-only)

Bumps insta from 1.45.0 to 1.45.1.
Aligns transitive windows-sys to 0.59.0 for errno, quinn-udp, rustix, tempfile, and tidies stacker entries.

No source code changes; only Cargo.lock adjustments.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit c23487d. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-01-01T00:40:16Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust snapshot-testing crate insta from 1.45.0 to 1.45.1 (lockfile refresh).
Notes: Brings in the upstream bugfix for backward compatibility with older TOML snapshot formats and updates related transitive deps (notably windows-sys to 0.59.0 where applicable).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-01-01T00:42:23Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.02%. Comparing base (5ad22f6) to head (c23487d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8232      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.02%   59.02%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1187     1187              
  Lines      112486   112486              
  Branches     4939     4939              
==========================================
- Hits        66394    66393       -1     
- Misses      45334    45335       +1     
  Partials      758      758

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.88% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`66.80% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.89% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.47% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`25.61% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`30.54% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`46.65% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.36% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`68.54% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.10% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`88.18% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

github-actions · 2026-01-01T01:45:13Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$25.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.884 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-81.773 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-50.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.791 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.862 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.778 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.064 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.09 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.53 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.79 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 128 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.840 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$74.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 403 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.578 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.802 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.469 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$412 \mathrm{ms} \pm 808 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$311 \mathrm{ms} \pm 824 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.906 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.665 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.462 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.377 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.990 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.938 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$7.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$92.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$58.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 386 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$48.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.526 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$75.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.415 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.449 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.717 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 539 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.485 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-61.722 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$545 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.13 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update Rust crate insta to v1.45.1

c23487d

hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge January 1, 2026 00:38

github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jan 1, 2026

augmentcode bot reviewed Jan 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign January 1, 2026 00:42 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut January 1, 2026 00:44 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash January 1, 2026 00:50 View deployment

graphite-app bot requested a review from a team January 1, 2026 01:45

vilkinsons assigned TimDiekmann Jan 1, 2026

indietyp approved these changes Jan 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 2, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 0e233cf Jan 2, 2026
171 checks passed

hash-worker bot deleted the deps/rs/insta-1.x-lockfile branch January 2, 2026 07:45

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Update Rust crate `insta` to v1.45.1 #8232

Update Rust crate `insta` to v1.45.1 #8232

Uh oh!

hash-worker bot commented Jan 1, 2026

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Jan 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Jan 1, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 1, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Update Rust crate insta to v1.45.1 #8232

Update Rust crate insta to v1.45.1 #8232

Uh oh!

Conversation

hash-worker bot commented Jan 1, 2026

Release Notes

v1.45.1

Configuration

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Jan 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Jan 1, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 1, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Update Rust crate `insta` to v1.45.1 #8232

Update Rust crate `insta` to v1.45.1 #8232

`v1.45.1`

cursor bot commented Jan 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading