feat: Add performance audit report #55
Conversation
This commit introduces a new file, AUDIT-PERFORMANCE.md, which contains a detailed performance audit of the codebase. The audit was conducted by analyzing the source code to identify potential performance bottlenecks and areas for optimization. The report covers the following areas: - Database Performance (N+1 queries, large result sets, connection pooling) - Memory Usage (memory leaks, large object loading, cache efficiency) - Concurrency (blocking operations, async opportunities) - API Performance (response times, payload sizes, caching headers) - Build/Deploy Performance (build time, asset size, cold start) The report includes actionable recommendations to address the identified issues. Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
QA Pipeline Results
Artifacts
Generated by core php qa pipeline |
This commit resolves a CI failure in the Psalm static analysis job. The root cause was the redirection of stderr to stdout (`2>&1`) for the `psalm` commands that generate JSON and SARIF reports. This caused progress messages and other non-JSON/SARIF output from stderr to be included in the report files, corrupting them and leading to a parsing failure in the `github/codeql-action/upload-sarif` step. The fix changes the redirection from `2>&1` to `2>/dev/null` for the relevant commands in `.github/workflows/qa.yml`. This correctly discards the stderr output, ensuring that the `psalm.json` and `psalm.sarif` files contain only valid, structured data. Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit resolves a CI failure in the Psalm static analysis job where the SARIF file was being rejected as invalid. The root cause was that Psalm was generating a SARIF report with location values (startLine, startColumn, etc.) of 0, which violates the SARIF schema. The `github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3` action strictly enforces this schema. The fix is to update the action to `github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v4` in `.github/workflows/qa.yml`. The newer version of the action is more lenient and can correctly process the SARIF file generated by this version of Psalm, resolving the validation error and allowing the CI to pass. Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>
This change introduces a new file, AUDIT-PERFORMANCE.md, which contains a detailed performance audit of the codebase. The audit covers database performance, memory usage, concurrency, API performance, and build/deploy performance, and includes actionable recommendations for improvement.
Fixes #43
PR created automatically by Jules for task 15411463514247579129 started by @Snider