Skip to content

Conversation

@Snider
Copy link
Contributor

@Snider Snider commented Feb 2, 2026

This submission adds a new file, AUDIT-OWASP.md, which contains a comprehensive security audit of the codebase based on the OWASP Top 10. The audit identifies several vulnerabilities and provides recommendations for remediation.

Fixes #36


PR created automatically by Jules for task 18275114804071074432 started by @Snider

This commit introduces a new file, AUDIT-OWASP.md, which contains a comprehensive security audit of the codebase based on the OWASP Top 10. The audit identifies several vulnerabilities, including a hardcoded API token, a potential SSRF vulnerability, and a logging failure. The report provides a summary of the findings and recommendations for remediation.

Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Snider has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch owasp-audit-report-18275114804071074432

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2026

QA Pipeline Results

Check Status Details
Tests 207 tests, 410 assertions
PHPStan 0 errors
Psalm 15 issues
Code Style 0 files need formatting
Security 0 vulnerabilities
Artifacts
  • test-results.xml - JUnit test results
  • phpstan.json - PHPStan analysis
  • psalm.json / psalm.sarif - Psalm analysis
  • pint.json - Code style report
  • audit.json - Security audit

Generated by core php qa pipeline

google-labs-jules bot and others added 3 commits February 2, 2026 01:22
This commit fixes a CI failure in the Psalm static analysis job. The `2>&1` redirection was causing progress messages to be included in the SARIF and JSON output, which made the files invalid. This commit removes the redirection to ensure that only valid output is captured.

Co-authored-by: Snider <631881+Snider@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit changes the output format of the psalm command in the qa.yml workflow to the `github` format. This will provide more detailed error information in the CI logs, which will help to diagnose the root cause of the SARIF validation failure.
This commit adds the --debug flag to the psalm command in the qa.yml workflow. This will provide more detailed error information in the CI logs, which will help to diagnose the root cause of the SARIF validation failure.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

audit: OWASP Top 10 security review

2 participants