Skip to content

Visualization improvements#33

Open
NawaKhai wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
Visualization-Improvements
Open

Visualization improvements#33
NawaKhai wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
Visualization-Improvements

Conversation

@NawaKhai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Transferring public EAP Visualization work to the FAST repository

NawaKhai added 4 commits July 11, 2024 12:07
Visualization Model and its accompanying files.
Geometry files for a Blended-Wing-Body configuration
Fixed the bug when a propulsion architecture has only 1 thrust source that doesn't allow for all the power source connections to be made properly to that one thrust source.
Added TestGeometry.m to FAST repo which allows users to quickly view geometries in standalone mode
@NawaKhai NawaKhai requested a review from prmoko July 12, 2024 21:39
Added the PropArchTest file which allows users to rapidly view propulsion architectures into the FAST repository

@prmoko prmoko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, most of the code looks great! The visuals look great too (as always)! There's just a few fixes that need to be made and a couple other things to address:

  1. LM100JTrussBraced.m doesn't exist, so the case in TestGeometry.m that calls that file fails.
  2. Please check and fix the formatting of BWB.m; refer to Contributions.m (or .md) file for details on what to fix.
  3. Should the block comments for some components in SUSAN.m be uncommented (or removed)?
  4. In Line 359 of PropulsionArchitecture.m, the variable isn't used. Can this be removed, or will the variable be used at a later date for spacing the lines vertically?
  5. In PropArchTest.m, can the block-commented propulsion architectures be removed (or fixed to look like the other propulsion architectures tested)?
  6. Additionally, it's difficult to understand what's going on in PropArchTest(8). I like that you're using a unique combination of matrix inputs (very clever!), but maybe there's a way to simplify this test case so we can better see what is going on.
  7. Lastly, what is PropArchTest(5) trying to show? I noticed that one of the energy sources is not connected to any components in the propulsion architecture.

Otherwise, everything looks good. Feel free to address these comments and then we can get this content merged.

Updated how the propulsion architecture connections are printed to the command line.
Fixed typos in the printouts.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants