refactor: drop unused allocator params left over from fs_compat retirement#294
Merged
refactor: drop unused allocator params left over from fs_compat retirement#294
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Removes vestigial
_ = allocator;markers across the cli/, core/, ui/, and update/ trees. These were dead public-surface parameters - some left over from thefs_compat.Child.init(argv, allocator)API that no longer needs an allocator after the move tostd.process.spawn, others kept "for parity" with sibling JSON helpers even though the body never touched the value.The dispatcher table in
main.zigis now slightly irregular:listandcompletionsno longer accept an allocator because their bodies do not need one. Each command's signature now declares what it actually consumes rather than padding to a uniform shape that hid the dead weight.Related Issue
Notes for Reviewers