Skip to content

Add Clone Graph solution and tests#85

Merged
kobukuro merged 7 commits intomainfrom
feat/add-clone-graph-solution-and-tests
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

Add Clone Graph solution and tests#85
kobukuro merged 7 commits intomainfrom
feat/add-clone-graph-solution-and-tests

Conversation

@kobukuro
Copy link
Owner

  • Add clone_graph solution with DFS approach using hash map for visited nodes
  • Add 3 test cases covering 4-node graph, single node, and empty graph
  • Include deep copy verification helper to ensure proper cloning
  • Remove old file from Depth First Search folder

  - Add clone_graph solution with DFS approach using hash map for visited nodes
  - Add 3 test cases covering 4-node graph, single node, and empty graph
  - Include deep copy verification helper to ensure proper cloning
  - Remove old file from Depth First Search folder
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 19, 2026 05:20
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a solution for LeetCode problem 133 (Clone Graph) using a depth-first search approach with hash map memoization. The solution correctly implements graph cloning by maintaining a mapping of original nodes to their clones to handle cycles and shared references.

Changes:

  • Add DFS-based clone_graph solution with hash map for tracking visited nodes
  • Add comprehensive test suite with deep copy verification helper
  • Cover three test cases: 4-node cyclic graph, single node, and empty graph

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File Description
problems/medium/clone_graph_133/solution.py Implements Node class and clone_graph solution using DFS with mapping dictionary
problems/medium/clone_graph_133/test_solution.py Test suite with setup_method pattern and custom deep copy verification
problems/medium/clone_graph_133/init.py Empty init file following project structure

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.



class Solution:
def clone_graph(self, node: 'Node', mapping=None) -> Optional['Node']:
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 19, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The mapping parameter should not be part of the public API. Exposing internal state as an optional parameter can lead to confusion and misuse. Consider using a nested helper function that takes the mapping parameter, while keeping the public clone_graph method with only the node parameter. This is the pattern used in other DFS solutions in the codebase like word_search_79 and course_schedule_207.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
kobukuro and others added 3 commits February 19, 2026 13:39
  - Fix grammar: change "a number of" to "the number of"
  - Add comma for better sentence structure
  - Use present tense instead of conditional tense
  - Clarify worst-case recursion stack scenario with example
  - Move `if node is None` check to function start
  - Avoid unnecessary operations when input is None
  - Align with early exit best practice
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Feb 19, 2026

@kobukuro I've opened a new pull request, #86, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.

Copilot AI and others added 3 commits February 19, 2026 05:52
Co-authored-by: kobukuro <9405082+kobukuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kobukuro <9405082+kobukuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix unused visited_clone variable in clone graph test verification
@kobukuro kobukuro merged commit d3f07fb into main Feb 19, 2026
1 check passed
@kobukuro kobukuro deleted the feat/add-clone-graph-solution-and-tests branch February 19, 2026 06:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants