refactor: reorganize parking system solution to new structure#88
refactor: reorganize parking system solution to new structure#88
Conversation
Move LeetCode 1603 (Design Parking System) from flat Design/ directory to standardized problems/easy/design_parking_system_1603/ structure. Improvements: - Convert to PEP 8 compliant snake_case naming (add_car, spaces) - Add pytest test suite with documentation - Simplify conditional logic in add_car method - Follow project's standardized directory layout
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR refactors LeetCode problem 1603 (Design Parking System) from the legacy flat Design/ directory structure to the standardized problems/easy/design_parking_system_1603/ layout. The implementation converts method names from camelCase to PEP 8 compliant snake_case and adds a pytest test suite with documentation.
Changes:
- Reorganizes files into standardized problem directory structure with
solution.py,test_solution.py, and__init__.py - Converts method name from
addCartoadd_carfollowing PEP 8 snake_case convention - Adds pytest test suite with LeetCode example test case and documentation
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| problems/easy/design_parking_system_1603/solution.py | ParkingSystem class implementation with snake_case naming and dictionary-based space tracking |
| problems/easy/design_parking_system_1603/test_solution.py | Pytest test class with helper method for testing multiple constructor/method calls |
| problems/easy/design_parking_system_1603/init.py | Empty module initialization file following project structure |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class TestSolution: | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The TestSolution class doesn't inherit from BaseTestSolution, which is the common pattern for most test files in the codebase. While not strictly required for this simple test, inheriting from BaseTestSolution provides consistency with other tests and access to utilities like timeout handling. Consider changing to "class TestSolution(BaseTestSolution):" and adding the import "from tests.base_test import BaseTestSolution".
| class TestSolution: | |
| from tests.base_test import BaseTestSolution | |
| class TestSolution(BaseTestSolution): |
| def add_car(self, car_type: int) -> bool: | ||
| if self.spaces[car_type] == 0: | ||
| return False | ||
| self.spaces[car_type] -= 1 | ||
| return True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The add_car method doesn't validate that car_type is valid (1, 2, or 3). If an invalid car_type is passed, this will raise a KeyError when accessing self.spaces[car_type]. While LeetCode constraints may guarantee valid inputs, defensive programming suggests adding validation or at least a comment about the expected input range. Consider adding a check or documenting the assumption that car_type will always be in range [1, 3].
| self.spaces = {1: big, | ||
| 2: medium, | ||
| 3: small} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The dictionary formatting is inconsistent with PEP 8 style for multiline dictionaries. When a dictionary is split across multiple lines, each key-value pair should be on its own line with consistent indentation, or the opening brace should be followed by a newline. Consider formatting as either: self.spaces = {1: big, 2: medium, 3: small} (single line) or with proper alignment:
self.spaces = {
1: big,
2: medium,
3: small
}
| self.spaces = {1: big, | |
| 2: medium, | |
| 3: small} | |
| self.spaces = { | |
| 1: big, | |
| 2: medium, | |
| 3: small | |
| } |
Move LeetCode 1603 (Design Parking System) from flat Design/ directory to standardized problems/easy/design_parking_system_1603/ structure.
Improvements: