-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 329
added: unlimited switch in otb config bottom sheet for unlimited time game #2344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Couldn't quite decide if I wanted to put the "Unlimited --- Switch" layout at bottom or top of minutes per side, but decided to put at bottom. Also the text should I make "Unlimited time" or is "Unlimited" enough? I am open to any suggestions and feedback. Thank you. |
This seems like a great idea and I think it'd be more consistent too. I think I'd just not have the Rated part and remove Correspondence Time Control option and From Position option for Variant. Those features if to be developed for otb should be separate PR. I will work on it and keep a branch. I'd also like to know what others think. |
After further thought, I found out if I were to make this change there will be 1 more click involved as the user will have to open a whole new dialog just to select unlimited or clock. As for my current approach a single switch is enough as it's only 2 option. I also think correspondence in otb isn't going to happen so unless there are more than 2 options i.e clock and unlimited. I think the current approach of simple switch is optimal. While I do think it'd be more consistent in a pure layout point of view but at the cost of UX isn't something that feels right. So I think this PR should function well without those changes. |
|
My only retort would be that generally a user will probably have consistent behavior. This would mean it would be helpful though if it is able to save your prior state of time control specifics if possible (which I was already thinking of ticketing separately anyway as it's a little unnecessary that if someone always plays 3+0 that it keeps jumping to 5+3 rather than retains). But obviously it would be nice to hear what Veloce thinks for the overall layout for how to handle switching between unlimited and clock:
|










Closes #2315